The effectiveness of adding a scapular exercise programme to physical therapy treatment in patients with distal radius fracture treated conservatively: a randomized controlled trial

Gutiérrez-Espinoza, Héctor; Araya-Quintanilla, Felipe; Gutiérrez-Monclus, Rodrigo; Cavero‐Redondo, Iván; Álvarez‐Bueno, Celia

doi:10.1177/0269215519866240

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Shoulder pain is a common clinical finding in the non-surgical treatment of DRF. However, only recently has this been reported as a complication [ 17 , 48 ]. We found ipsilateral shoulder pain greater than 20 points (a clinically significant difference) in VAS for more than 3 consecutive visits in 17 (AE) vs. 9 (BE) participants.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose For displaced distal radius fracture, this trial aimed to compare an above-elbow (AE) and below-elbow (BE) cast at the end of a 24-week follow-up using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire as a primary outcome. Methods This is a clinical trial with parallel groups (1:1) and a blinded evaluator. There are two non-surgical interventions: AE and BE. A total of 128 adult patients with acute (up to 7 days) displaced distal radius fracture of type A2-3, C1-3 by the AO classification were included. The follow-up was 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the DASH questionnaire at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the maintenance of reduction by the evaluation of radiographic parameters, pain measured by VAS, PRWE, objective functional evaluation and rate of adverse effects. Results The difference between the two groups in the DASH score at 24 weeks was not significant, with the mean (95% CI) DASH score being AE: 9.44 (2.70 to 16.17) vs. BE: 9.88 (3.19 to 16.57) (p = 0.895). The above-elbow group had a significantly greater worsening of the mean DASH score from baseline to 2 weeks (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in any of the other follow-up assessments. Objective functional evaluation, PRWE, radiographical measures and rates of reduction loss were similar between groups. Above-elbow casting resulted in more adverse effects (mostly shoulder pain; 19 events vs. 9 events); RR = 0.39 (0.19–0.94); p = 0.033 at the end of six-month follow-up. Conclusions This study did not demonstrate a difference between above-elbow and below-elbow cast in terms of DASH outcome at 6 months in non-surgical treatment of deviated distal radius fractures. However, below-elbow casting is less debilitating during the treatment period, has comparable performance in maintaining the reduction, and is related to fewer minor adverse effects than above-elbow casting.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%