The Effects of Augmented Physiological Feedback on Detection of Deception

Abstract

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing deta sources. Bothering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)DoD Polygraph Institute 7540 Pickens Avenue Fort Jackson, SC 29207 SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBERDoDPI99-P-0004/DoDPI02-R-0009 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTPublic release, distribution unlimited. 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 wonts)The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of two types of augmented physiological feedback (APF) on the reliability and accuracy of probable-lie comparison question test (CQT). Two hundred and ten college students participated in the study half of whom were guilty of a mock crime and half innocent. During questioning, one group received skin conductance feedback, a second group received composite feedback (skin conductance, cardiograph, and respiration), and a third group received no feedback. The results indicated that APF did not increase detection rates above that of no-feedback group in this study. However, APF did decrease the rate of habituation during repetition of the question sequences thus allowing for great discrimination between innocent and guilty participants as the CQT progressed. ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study was to assess the effects of two types of augmented physiological feedback (APF) on the reliability and accuracy of probable-lie comparison question tests (CQT). Two hundred and ten college students participated in the study, half of whom were guilty of a mock crime and half innocent. During questioning, one group received skin conductance feedback, a second group received composite feedback (skin conductance, cardiograph, and respiration), and a third group received no feedback. The results indicated that APF did not increase detection rates above that of the no-feedback group in this study.However, APF did decrease the rate of habituation during repetition of the question sequences thus allowing for greater discrimination between innocent and guilty participants as the CQT progressed.