2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00166-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of local application of D2 selective dopaminergic drugs into the medial prefrontal cortex of rats in a delayed spatial choice task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence suggesting a D2 modulation of working memory (Druzin et al, 2000) and age-related PFC cognitive functions (Arnsten et al, 1995). The inhibitory D2 effects on pyramidal cell excitability may constitute important cellular mechanisms for selection of relevant information in the PFC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence suggesting a D2 modulation of working memory (Druzin et al, 2000) and age-related PFC cognitive functions (Arnsten et al, 1995). The inhibitory D2 effects on pyramidal cell excitability may constitute important cellular mechanisms for selection of relevant information in the PFC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, intra-PFC infusions of SKF 81297 at doses ranging from 0.06 to 0.3 mg have been shown to impair performance on delayed response tasks when the baseline levels of performance are good (ie, during shorter delays), but these same doses improved working memory during longer delays, when baseline levels of performance were poor (Zahrt et al, 1997;Phillips, 2001, Chudasama and. Similarly, infusions of a D2 agonist have also been shown to disrupt performance of a delayed response task conducted in a Umaze (Druzin et al, 2000). In the present study, we observed neither a disruption nor an improvement in set-shifting following infusions of 0.06 or 0.2 mg of SKF 81297, although we did observe a slight, nonsignificant reduction in the number of errors committed by rats that were required to make the more difficult shift from a visual-cue-to a response-based strategy.…”
Section: Regulation Of Set-shifting By Both Pfc D1 and D2 Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is apparent that PFC D 1 receptor modulation of working memory takes the form of an "inverted U-shaped" curve (Arnsten 1997;Zahrt et al 1997;Williams and Castner 2005) where too little or too much D 1 receptor stimulation can hamper patterns of activity in PFC neural networks that normally mediate efficient working memory processes. Although the effects of D 2 receptor stimulation on working memory have yet to be explored fully, one notable study showed that infusions of a D 2 agonist also disrupt performance on a delayed response task conducted in a U-maze, whereas infusions of the D 2 antagonist sulpiride improved performance (Druzin et al 2000). This finding indicates that under some conditions, D 2 receptor activity in the PFC may also modulate working memory functions, but their contribution to these processes are distinct from those regulated by D 1 receptors.…”
Section: Working Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, infusions of the D 2 agonist quinpirole did not alter performance during the set shift. This lack of effects was surprising, considering that stimulation of DA receptors in the PFC can alter working memory performance (Zahrt et al 1997;Druzin et al 2000;Floresco and Phillips 2001;Chudasama and Robbins 2004). However, another study utilizing a perceptual setshifting task designed by Birrell and Brown (2000) showed that infusion of the partial D 1 agonist SKF 38393 does not Fig.…”
Section: Behavioral Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%