THE EFFECTS OF MULTI-COMPONENT EXERCISE TRAINING ON VO2max, MUSCLE MASS, WHOLE BONE MINERAL DENSITY AND FALL RISK IN COMMUNITY-DWELLING ELDERLY WOMEN

Kwon, Yoochan; Sang-Kab, Park; Kim, Eun‐Hee; jinkee, Park

doi:10.7600/jspfsm.57.339

Cited by 10 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 2 outlines the exercise prescription characteristics. The program duration ranged from six (Hartard et al, 1996;Ryan et al, 1998;Adami et al, 1999;Bemben et al, 2000;Sugiyama et al, 2002;Verschueren et al, 2004;Kwon et al, 2008;Bocalini et al, 2009;Chuin et al, 2009;Silverman et al, 2009;Sakai et al, 2010;Choquette et al, 2011;Tartibian et al, 2011;Karakiriou et al, 2012;Basat et al, 2013;Moreira et al, 2014;Nicholson et al, 2015;de Oliveira et al, 2019) to 30 months (Korpelainen et al, 2006).…”

Section: Study and Participants' Characteristicmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Aerobic exercise was predominately performed in the range between 60 and 80% of the maximum heart rate maximum (HRmax). In 54 intervention groups, the exercise intensity was progressively increased during the intervention period (Sinaki et al, 1989;Pruitt et al, 1992Pruitt et al, , 1995Bloomfield et al, 1993;Martin and Notelovitz, 1993;Nelson et al, 1994;Kohrt et al, 1995Kohrt et al, , 1997Nichols et al, 1995;Hartard et al, 1996;Kerr et al, 1996Kerr et al, , 2001Ryan et al, 1998;Kemmler, 1999;Bemben et al, 2000;Rhodes et al, 2000;Iwamoto et al, 2001;Chilibeck et al, 2002Chilibeck et al, , 2013Hans et al, 2002;Going et al, 2003;Jessup et al, 2003;Milliken et al, 2003;Kemmler et al, 2004Kemmler et al, , 2010Verschueren et al, 2004;Englund et al, 2005;Korpelainen et al, 2006;Evans et al, 2007;Maddalozzo et al, 2007;Bergstrom et al, 2008;Kwon et al, 2008;Bocalini et al, 2009;Chuin et al, 2009;de Matos et al, 2009;Deng, 2009;Choquette et al, 2011;Marques et al, 2011b,c;Tartibian et al, 2011;…”

Section: Exercise Characteristic Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fifty-one intervention groups adequately addressed their endpoints LS and/or FN BMD by their exercise protocol (site specificity) (Lau et al, 1992;Pruitt et al, 1992Pruitt et al, , 1995Nelson et al, 1994;Nichols et al, 1995;Hartard et al, 1996;Kerr et al, 1996Kerr et al, , 2001Lord et al, 1996;Kohrt et al, 1997;Kemmler, 1999;Bemben et al, 2000Bemben et al, , 2010Rhodes et al, 2000;Iwamoto et al, 2001;Chilibeck et al, 2002Chilibeck et al, , 2013Going et al, 2003;Jessup et al, 2003;Milliken et al, 2003;Kemmler et al, 2004Kemmler et al, , 2010Englund et al, 2005;Korpelainen et al, 2006;Evans et al, 2007;Maddalozzo et al, 2007;Woo et al, 2007;Bergstrom et al, 2008;Kwon et al, 2008;Bocalini et al, 2009;Chuin et al, 2009;de Matos et al, 2009;Deng, 2009;Choquette et al, 2011;Marques et al, 2011b,c;Karakiriou et al, 2012;Basat et al, 2013;Orsatti et al, 2013;Bello et al, 2014;Moreira et al, 2014;…”

Section: Exercise Characteristic Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Exercise sessions were supervised in 59 studies (Nelson et al, 1991(Nelson et al, , 1994Grove and Londeree, 1992;Lau et al, 1992;Pruitt et al, 1992Pruitt et al, , 1995Bloomfield et al, 1993;Caplan et al, 1993;Martin and Notelovitz, 1993;Bassey and Ramsdale, 1995;Nichols et al, 1995;Prince et al, 1995;Hartard et al, 1996;Kerr et al, 1996Kerr et al, , 2001Lord et al, 1996;Bassey et al, 1998;Ryan et al, 1998;Adami et al, 1999;Kemmler, 1999;Bemben et al, 2000Bemben et al, , 2010Rhodes et al, 2000;Chilibeck et al, 2002Chilibeck et al, , 2013Going et al, 2003;Jessup et al, 2003;Milliken et al, 2003;Chan et al, 2004;Kemmler et al, 2004Kemmler et al, , 2010Englund et al, 2005;Korpelainen et al, 2006;Wu et al, 2006;Evans et al, 2007;Maddalozzo et al, 2007;Woo et al, 2007;Bergstrom et al, 2008;Kwon et al, 2008;Bocalini et al, 2009;Chuin et al, 2009;…”

Section: Exercise Characteristic Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The majority of studies reported attendance rates of more than 70% [minimum: 39% (Prince et al, 1995), maximum: 100% (Brooke-Wavell et al, 1997;Ebrahim et al, 1997;Yamazaki et al, 2004)]. However, 15 studies did not provide any information regarding the attendance rate (Sinaki et al, 1989;Lau et al, 1992;Hatori et al, 1993;Iwamoto et al, 2001;Jessup et al, 2003;Milliken et al, 2003;Verschueren et al, 2004;Wu et al, 2006;Evans et al, 2007;Kwon et al, 2008;Park et al, 2008;de Matos et al, 2009;Tolomio et al, 2009;Orsatti et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2015).…”

Section: Exercise Characteristic Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Effect of Exercise Training on Bone Mineral Density in Post-menopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Osteoporosis is a major health problem in post-menopausal women (PMW). Exercise training is considered a cost-effective strategy to prevent osteoporosis in middle aged-older people. The purpose of this study is to summarize the effect of exercise on BMD among PMW. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, Science Direct, Eric, ProQuest, and Primo. BMD changes (standardized mean differences: SMD) of the lumbar spine (LS) femoral neck (FN) and/or total hip were considered as outcome measures. After subgroup categorization, statistical methods were used to combine data and compare subgroups. Seventy-five studies were included. The pooled number of participants was 5,300 (intervention group: n = 2,901, control group: n = 2,399). The pooled estimate of random effect analysis was SMD = 0.37, 95%-CI: 0.25-0.50, SMD = 0.33, 95%-CI: 0.23-0.43, and SMD = 0.40, 95%-CI: 0.28-0.51 for LS, FN, and total Hip-BMD, respectively. In the present meta-analysis, there was a significant (p < 0.001), but rather low effect (SMD = 0.33-0.40) of exercise on BMD at LS and proximal femur. A large variation among the single study findings was observed, with highly effective studies but also studies that trigger significant negative results. These findings can be largely attributed to differences among the exercise protocols of the studies. Findings suggest that the true effect of exercise on BMD is diluted by a considerable amount of studies with inadequate exercise protocols.

show abstract

Section: Study and Participants' Characteristicmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Exercise Characteristic Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Exercise Characteristic Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Exercise Characteristic Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Exercise Characteristic Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Effect of Exercise Training on Bone Mineral Density in Post-menopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Exercise training and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies with emphasis on potential moderators

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was (1) to determine exercise effects on bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women and (2) to address the corresponding implication of bone and menopausal status or supervision in postmenopausal women. A comprehensive search of eight electronic databases according to the PRISMA statement up to August 9, 2022, included controlled exercise trials ≥ 6 months. BMD changes (standardized mean differences: SMD) at the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) were considered as outcomes. Study group comparisons were conducted for osteopenia/osteoporosis versus normal BMD, early versus late postmenopausal women, and predominantly supervised versus predominantly non-supervised study arms. We applied an inverse heterogeneity (IVhet) model. In summary, 80 studies involving 94 training and 80 control groups with a pooled number of 5581 participants were eligible. The IVhet model determined SMDs of 0.29 (95% CI: 0.16-0.42), 0.27 (95% CI: 0.16-0.39), and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.30-0.52) for LS, FN, and THBMD, respectively. Heterogeneity between the trial results varied from low (I 2 = 20%, TH BMD) to substantial (I 2 = 68%, LS-BMD). Evidence for publication bias/small study effects was negligibly low (FN-, TH-BMD) to high (LSBMD). We observed no significant differences (p > .09) for exercise effects on LS-, FN-, or TH-BMD-LS between studies/study arms with or without osteopenia/osteoporosis, early versus late postmenopausal women, or predominantly supervised versus non-supervised exercise programs. Using robust statistical methods, the present work provides further evidence for a positive effect of exercise on BMD in postmenopausal women. Differences in bone status (osteopenia/osteoporosis versus normal bone), menopausal status (early versus late postmenopausal), and supervision (yes versus no) did not significantly affect the exercise effects on BMD at LS or proximal femur.

show abstract

Effects of Different Types of Exercise on Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this sub-analysis of a comprehensive meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the effect of different types of exercise on (areal) bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women. A systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA statement included (a) controlled trials, (b) with at least one exercise and one control group, (c) intervention ≥ 6 months, (d) BMD assessments at lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) or total hip (TH), (e) in postmenopausal women. Eight electronic databases were scanned without language restrictions up to March 2019. The present subgroup analysis was conducted as a mixed-effect meta-analysis with “type of exercise” as the moderator. The 84 eligible exercise groups were classified into (a) weight bearing (WB, n = 30) exercise, (b) (dynamic) resistance exercise (DRT, n = 18), (c) mixed WB&DRT interventions (n = 36). Outcome measures were standardized mean differences (SMD) for BMD-changes at LS, FN and TH. All types of exercise significantly affect BMD at LS, FN and TH. SMD for LS average 0.40 (95% CI 0.15–0.65) for DRT, SMD 0.26 (0.03–0.49) for WB and SMD 0.42 (0.23–0.61) for WB&DRT. SMD for FN were 0.27 (0.09–0.45) for DRT, 0.37 (0.12–0.62) for WB and 0.35 (0.19–0.51) for WB&DRT. Lastly, SMD for TH changes were 0.51 (0.28–0.74) for DRT, 0.40 (0.21–0.58) for WB and 0.34 (0.14–0.53) for WB&DRT. In summary, we provided further evidence for the favorable effect of exercise on BMD largely independent of the type of exercise. However, in order to generate dedicated exercise recommendations or exercise guideline, meta-analyses might be a too rough tool.

show abstract

THE EFFECTS OF MULTI-COMPONENT EXERCISE TRAINING ON VO2max, MUSCLE MASS, WHOLE BONE MINERAL DENSITY AND FALL RISK IN COMMUNITY-DWELLING ELDERLY WOMEN

Cited by 10 publications

References 29 publications

Effect of Exercise Training on Bone Mineral Density in Post-menopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies

Effect of Exercise Training on Bone Mineral Density in Post-menopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies

Exercise training and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies with emphasis on potential moderators

Effects of Different Types of Exercise on Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About