“…If we look beyond zoo-based research, we find that animal handling, generally speaking, has long been considered a source of potential stress and welfare compromise in laboratory animals (Balbcombe et al, 2004;Meany et al, 1996;Meijer et al, 2007;Núñez et al, 1996). Insights into the impact of on-grounds transportation on zoo animal welfare are just beginning to accumulate (e.g., Göttert et al, 2015;Tetzlaff et al, 2016), but generally speaking, transportation is associated with physiological or behavioral stress responses (e.g., Campbell-Palmer & Rosell, 2015;Fazio et al, 2019;Tonn et al, 2016;Volfová et al, 2019). In one study focused specifically on program animals in zoos, Baird et al (2016) measured both behavioral and physiological indicators of welfare to investigate the effects of ambassador programming on three common program animals: armadillos (Lypeutes matacus, Chaetophractus vellerosus, Dasypus novemcinctus, Euphractus sexcinctus), red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis), and hedgehogs (Atelerix albiventris).…”