2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: A randomized multicenter study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The short-term response was evaluated by change in tumor size according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v. 1.1) as follows: complete response (CR) was defined as eradication of cervical lesion; partial response (PR) (a ≥30% decrease in the longest tumor diameter); progressive disease (PD) (a ≥20% increase in the longest diameter (LD) of tumor) and stable disease (SD) as the decrease or increase of LD of the cervical lesion was less than PR or PD (25). Many studies proposed two cycles of NACT were adequate for LACC patients to obtain optimal efficacy with relatively low adverse reactions (9,26). Based on various treatment courses in the study, we set up new response evaluation criteria especially for upcoming radiomic analysis as following: For patients with CR or PR by RECIST (v.1.1) within two cycles of treatment are recognized as "responder" (chemo-sensitive).…”
Section: Assessment Of Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short-term response was evaluated by change in tumor size according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v. 1.1) as follows: complete response (CR) was defined as eradication of cervical lesion; partial response (PR) (a ≥30% decrease in the longest tumor diameter); progressive disease (PD) (a ≥20% increase in the longest diameter (LD) of tumor) and stable disease (SD) as the decrease or increase of LD of the cervical lesion was less than PR or PD (25). Many studies proposed two cycles of NACT were adequate for LACC patients to obtain optimal efficacy with relatively low adverse reactions (9,26). Based on various treatment courses in the study, we set up new response evaluation criteria especially for upcoming radiomic analysis as following: For patients with CR or PR by RECIST (v.1.1) within two cycles of treatment are recognized as "responder" (chemo-sensitive).…”
Section: Assessment Of Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…LVSI and vaginal surgical margin were reported to be independent prognostic factors132627, and these risk factors were statistically significant in univariate Cox regression for DFS during risk model training. Although these two margins were ultimately excluded from the multivariate Cox model, our study did validate previous findings17.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) was proven to be an effective treatment for cervical cancer23. However, approximately 20% of patients do not respond to NACT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, no clinical factors have shown a strong correlation with the response to NACT23. Additionally, there has been no bio-marker proven to effectively predict the response to NACT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%