2020
DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2020.1865473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The environmental impact of various forms of waste PET bottle management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incineration could be accepted as a solution if the separation of PET bottle waste within the collection system is not possible and particularly if contaminated PET bottle waste cannot be reused. Incineration with energy recovery as a second option is supported by the work of Bałazi ńska et al [30], who found that the environmental impact of recycling was lower than that of energy recovery, while disposal was the worst scenario. Incineration with energy recovery could be used when electricity demand is difficult to meet through renewable resources.…”
Section: Technology Implementation Scenariomentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Incineration could be accepted as a solution if the separation of PET bottle waste within the collection system is not possible and particularly if contaminated PET bottle waste cannot be reused. Incineration with energy recovery as a second option is supported by the work of Bałazi ńska et al [30], who found that the environmental impact of recycling was lower than that of energy recovery, while disposal was the worst scenario. Incineration with energy recovery could be used when electricity demand is difficult to meet through renewable resources.…”
Section: Technology Implementation Scenariomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Life cycle assessment (LCA) is one method that compares the treatments of PET bottle waste. Bałazi ńska et al (2021) [30] compared systems for PET bottle waste, such as recycling, energy recovery, and disposal, without explicitly mentioning the technology used. The result was that recycling had the least negative impact on the environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PET is the preferred material for water bottles because it is inexpensive to produce, transparent, and carbon dioxide resistant [7]; however, PET bottles create many negative environmental impacts due to their short useful life, large quantities of production, and prolonged decomposition process [8]. There is substantial energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission during the PET manufacturing process [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, PET bottles have low production costs. Despite these benefits, PET's limited useful life, high production volumes, and hundreds of years of decomposition time create several environmental concerns [5]. Furthermore, the production of PET is an energyintensive process that produces a substantial quantity of greenhouse gases (GHGs) [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%