1983
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889883010195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The estimation of standard deviations in powder diffraction Rietveld refinements

Abstract: It is shown that when the observed and calculated intensities in a powder diffraction pattern differ because of model errors which affect the calculated integrated intensities, in addition to the random counting errors, Rietveld refinement with weights determined solely by counting statistics yields estimated standard deviations for the crystal structure parameters which tend to be measures of the precision rather than the accuracy of these parameters. Under these conditions, e.s.d.'s calculated by Rietveld re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding mean neutron 9~ value for the O-atom coordinates is 4.1, leading to a difference between the e.s.d, and probable error of only a factor of two. These values are typical of the differences generally encountered in Rietveld-analysis results (Young, 1980;Scott, 1983;Hill & Madsen, 1986) and also of those observed in systematic single-crystal studies Coppens et al, 1984).…”
Section: Atomic Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The corresponding mean neutron 9~ value for the O-atom coordinates is 4.1, leading to a difference between the e.s.d, and probable error of only a factor of two. These values are typical of the differences generally encountered in Rietveld-analysis results (Young, 1980;Scott, 1983;Hill & Madsen, 1986) and also of those observed in systematic single-crystal studies Coppens et al, 1984).…”
Section: Atomic Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…'s are critical to the correct interpretation of small differences (e.g. oxidation states, occupancy parameters or unusual bond lengths that might indicate unusual chemistry), the reader is referred to the papers by Prince (1981Prince ( , 1993, Scott (1983), Hill & Flack (1987), Hill & Madsen (1987), Antoniadis et al (1990), Be  rar (1992) and Cox & Papoular (1996).…”
Section: Estimated Standard Deviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, it is clear that the e.s.d. 's reflect mainly random experimental errors, neglecting the effect of systematic errors arising due to model inadequacy (Scott, 1983;Young, 1993). For all these reasons, it is obvious that the e.s.d.…”
Section: Estimated Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%