The Eu-China Comprehensive Stategic Partnership in Context of Eu General Concept of the „strategic Partnership“

Abstract

Strategic (Comprehensive) Partnership, as a general concept and also as a specific foreign policy instrument for developing the European Union's relations with key world countries (strategic partners), involves not only equivalent, mutually beneficial and institutionalized cooperation in many areas but also a joint solution to strategic (security and defense) issues and issues of regional and global governance where parties not only cooperate but also share responsibility. The objective of this article is to analyze the legal instruments (criteria) of the EU-China Strategic Partnership and to compare its character with the general legal concept of the EU Strategic Partnership. Based on this analysis we will answer the question whether the EU-China Strategic Partnership shows evidence of unclarity, imperfection and elusiveness of the EU's Strategic Partnership.

Building University-Industry Co-Innovation Networks in Transnational Innovation Ecosystems: Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach of Integrating Social Sciences and Artificial Intelligence

“…The booming practices of EU-China STI cooperation have rarely been explored scientifically, remaining marginal in EU-China studies. The existing literature on the EU-China relationship e.g., [57][58][59] deals with three main pillars of cooperation between the EU and China, namely the strategic dialogue initiated in 2005, the economic and trade dialogue commenced in 2008 and the "People-to-People Dialogue" launched in 2012 to improve cooperation in education, culture, youth and research.…”

Influence of existing social and economic interactions on sustainable territory development: the case of Iceland

“…The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 provides literature review on sustainable territory development of Iceland within the context of modern "worlds-economies", Section 3 outlines research methodology followed by a description of the empirical data and analysis in Section 4, Section 5 presents the results and discussion, and, finally, Section 6 offers conclusions. In modern scientific literature, the most frequent is the indication on two "worlds-economies" dominant in the global space: the first one with the center in the United Kingdom-the USA † , the second onewith the center in China (Zoega, 2013;Kiva, 2014;Efremenko and Meleshkina, 2014;Delyagin, 2015;Cihelkova et al, 2017), i.e. provisionally the North and the South if we use the concepts provided by the Human Development Report 2013.Possibly, Iceland's social and economic interactions will also, especially in recent years, gravitate toward either the North or the South.…”

Untitled

“…The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 provides literature review on sustainable territory development of Iceland within the context of modern "worlds-economies", Section 3 outlines research methodology followed by a description of the empirical data and analysis in Section 4, Section 5 presents the results and discussion, and, finally, Section 6 offers conclusions. In modern scientific literature, the most frequent is the indication on two "worlds-economies" dominant in the global space: the first one with the center in the United Kingdom-the USA † , the second onewith the center in China (Zoega, 2013;Kiva, 2014;Efremenko and Meleshkina, 2014;Delyagin, 2015;Cihelkova et al, 2017), i.e. provisionally the North and the South if we use the concepts provided by the Human Development Report 2013.Possibly, Iceland's social and economic interactions will also, especially in recent years, gravitate toward either the North or the South.…”