Public Health Ethics and Practice 2009
DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781847421029.003.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evaluation of public health education initiatives on smoking and lung cancer: an ethical critique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, health promotion can harm. Allmark et al looked at how public health education initiatives relating to smoking had been evaluated between 1992 and 2004 (Allmark et al 2010). They found that the evaluation was done purely on behavior, namely, whether people stopped smoking or did not take it up; if so, the initiative was judged successful.…”
Section: Hidden Harmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, health promotion can harm. Allmark et al looked at how public health education initiatives relating to smoking had been evaluated between 1992 and 2004 (Allmark et al 2010). They found that the evaluation was done purely on behavior, namely, whether people stopped smoking or did not take it up; if so, the initiative was judged successful.…”
Section: Hidden Harmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, health promotion can harm. Allmark et al looked at how public health education initiatives relating to smoking had been evaluated between 1992 and 2004 (Allmark et al 2010). They found that the evaluation was done purely on behavior, namely, whether people stopped smoking or did not take it up; if so, the initiative was judged successful.…”
Section: Hidden Harmsmentioning
confidence: 99%