The Evolution of the Collaborative Environmental Governance Network in Guizhou Province, China

Abstract

China has successively set goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, aiming to transform to a green and low-carbon economy. Collaborative environmental governance (CEG) is an important way to achieve this transformation. To improve collaborative environmental governance, the study of the evolution of the collaborative environmental governance network (CEGN) is necessary. In this study, the CEGNs in different periods in Guizhou Province, China are established based on social network analysis. Then, the evolution of environment governance policy implementers’ functions in the network is investigated by two-dimensional (breadth and intensity) matrices. Moreover, the evolution of core implementers’ functions and its impacts on the operation of the network are analyzed based on the network stability. The results show that the network size, frequency of collaboration, and cohesion have gradually increased, and the network structure has changed from a loose pattern to an expanded and balanced system. Implementers such as the governments of municipalities (prefectures) (MGs) and counties (districts) (CGs), urban management committee (UMCs), and municipal (prefecture) ecological environment bureaus (MBEEs) have played leading and coordinating roles at different phases. However, the cohesion of the network is low, indicating a low level of collaboration. This study integrates the collaborative governance theory and social network analysis, which provides a new way for the study of CEG. In addition, the CEG effect is evaluated by analyzing the evolution of the CEGN, which provides a reference for the CEG policy making in developing regions.

Dynamic Governance: Utilization of Waste Methane Gas as Renewable Energy (Case Study at Puuwatu Kendari Landfill)

“…Similarly, the need for gas consumption, especially for households, has also increased. The increase in electricity and gas needs also has an impact on high air pollution if not followed by the selection of environmentally friendly fuel types [3]. One form of an environmentally friendly city concept by applying the concept of a green city.…”

Structural Characteristics of Intergovernmental Water Pollution Control Cooperation Networks Using Social Network Analysis and GIS in Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration, China

“…These partnerships are often formalized through the signing of cooperation agreements, including various framework agreements, declarations of cooperation, opinions, and joint actions [22][23][24]. These intergovernmental collaborations include both vertical cooperation within administrative hierarchies and horizontal cooperation between governments or departments at the same level [25][26][27]. The cooperation agreements and actions depict regional cooperative relationships, providing intangible social benefits for cooperating local governments.…”

“…In turn, these actions are interconnected, forming a network of cooperation among local governments. The cooperation network embeds individuals and departments from different regions into collective actions by local governments, forming a network structure of regional collaboration [26,27]. In recent years, network research has drawn wide attention from public management and policy scholars in the field of public events such as environmental governance.…”

“…In recent years, network research has drawn wide attention from public management and policy scholars in the field of public events such as environmental governance. Many existing studies focus on the structure, motives, and performance of networks [27][28][29][30]. For example, Fliervoet et al (2016) abstracted a cooperative network among central governments, local governments, farmers' associations, and other stakeholders and discussed the cooperation governance in the floodplain management of the Rhine Delta in the Netherlands [31].…”