The evolutionary circular and human centered city: Towards an ecological and humanistic “re-generation” of the current city governance

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Local government is fundamental for achieving the ecological transition of our societies/cities. Also COVID-19 has shown that many of the barriers and bottlenecks in implementing public top-down initiatives are not technical (financial, economic, administrative, etc.) but cultural. They generate a lack of consensus with the risks of reducing the effectiveness of public interventions and investments. OBJECTIVE: The paper proposes the profile of a “circular governance” (i.e. that assumes the model of the circular economy) that is also “human centered”, capable of reducing inequalities, enhancing the processes of real participation in the construction of a desirable future for cities, through its capacity to regenerate material and no-material components/values. This perspective intersects with the cultural/educational dimension to which the new governance should devote much greater attention. CONCLUSION: A critical test is the transformation of abandoned urban spaces into attractive places for activities, investments and people. These disused spaces, which have often become repulsive waste deposits, are especially abundant in port cities. They are most often included in areas of particularly high landscape and cultural value. The paper suggests the elaboration of prototypes of “circular heritage symbiotic ecosystems” that are able to respect some general conditions (or principles). Suitable and effective assessment tools must be available to public, private and social actors to verify the proposal consistency and then to build new win-win-win partnerships. But it is also necessary to strengthen the educational perspective in the activities of the new governance, because preferences, values and needs should not be considered as already “given”, but should be constructed, thus nourishing the critical spirit of citizens so that they can creatively combine private interests and common good, thus becoming “artist of citizenship/civic engagement”.

Towards the Human Circular Tourism: Recommendations, Actions, and Multidimensional Indicators for the Tourist Category

“…Some scholars [77][78][79][80][81][82][83] highlight the need to put people's wellbeing at the center of economic development, promoting a 'humanization' of the economy [84]. However, in the scientific literature this issue has been approached much more from a theoretical strategic point of view, rather than investigating operational tools to adopt for its implementation, evaluation, and monitoring.…”

“…Moreover, the third action focuses on the support that technologies can offer to reconnect the economy of man and the economy of nature [18], in order to increase awareness (and thus responsibility) for certain actions. Thus, responsibility is linked to the duty to know, to foresee the consequences of the people choices, both as individuals and as groups, due to the interdependence with others [84]. From this perspective, the actions proposed in the environmental dimension is also connected with the social aspects [116].…”

Research on Ecological Design of Intelligent Manhole Covers Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

“…Following years of urban growth, urban renewal emerges as a crucial approach to enhance urban infrastructure, establish thriving urban brands, and cater to the expanding needs of city residents [9]. Urban public infrastructure must continuously enhance ecological civilization and urban quality to build livable, intelligent, and sustainable city brands amid urban reconstruction [10]. The idea of creating "smart cities" has led to the advancement of stormwater infrastructure in urban areas.…”

Designing Sustainable Services for Cities: Adopting a Systemic Perspective in Service Design Experiments

“…Contemporary cities are increasingly adopting collaborative, participatory, experimental, and innovative governance models [18] that involve the ability to coordinate different actors around shared goals. As far as service design is concerned, the human-centered approach and codesign and cocreation processes facilitate and enable the construction of consensus relationships and help to visualize (including through experimental prototypes) solutions, validate their effectiveness, and imagine their feasibility.…”