1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00225-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The factor structure of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale in swedish clinical and nonclinical samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
43
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies confirmed the one factor solution proposed by Antonofski [30,31], while others, similar to our findings, failed to support the one factor solution [32,33]. A two [34], three [35] and five [36] factor solutions have been also proposed, but failed to actually support the theoretical construction principles which suggest three sub-dimensions, namely manageability, meaningfulness and comprehensibility. Our findings and the results of previous studies indicate that it would be rather preferable to use the SOC scale as a measure of the whole, not examining the three subscales separately, which was also Antonovsky's intention [3].…”
Section: Unadjusted Adjustedsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Some studies confirmed the one factor solution proposed by Antonofski [30,31], while others, similar to our findings, failed to support the one factor solution [32,33]. A two [34], three [35] and five [36] factor solutions have been also proposed, but failed to actually support the theoretical construction principles which suggest three sub-dimensions, namely manageability, meaningfulness and comprehensibility. Our findings and the results of previous studies indicate that it would be rather preferable to use the SOC scale as a measure of the whole, not examining the three subscales separately, which was also Antonovsky's intention [3].…”
Section: Unadjusted Adjustedsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Comparison between our sample and Swedish norms (Sandell, Blomberg, & Lazar, 1998;M ¼ 5.29; SD ¼ 0.74) provided the cut-off for SOC as 4.47.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Figure 12.3 shows the sense of coherence as a multidimensional construct. Sandell et al (1998) examined the sense of coherence instrument among a sample of Swedes and could not find support for a common factor, nor the three dimensions of comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness. Three more or less stable dimensions emerged, where lust and depression were two extremes which could best be referred to the dimension of meaningfulness.…”
Section: Construct Validitymentioning
confidence: 95%