Introduction/Objective Radical prostatectomy is a treatment option with high
curative potential in patients with prostate cancer of moderate-risk. The
aim of the study is to assess perioperative results of laparoscopic (LRP)
and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORRP). Methods From 2016 to 2020,
a total of 244 patients undergone RP, as follow: 145 patients LRP and 99
patients ORRP. Demographic data, preoperative parameters, perioperative and
pathological outcomes were analyzed and compared among LRP and ORRP groups.
Results In regard to demographic data and preoperative parameters (BMI, mean
age, median pretreatment PSA, clinical stage and Gleason score from biopsy),
there are no differences between the observed groups. Patients from ORRP
group had significantly shorter operative time (p < 0.05). Patients from LRP
group had major advantages in regard to estimated blood loss (EBL) (550 ml
for LRP vs. 1450 ml for ORRP), hospitalization time (six days for LRP vs.
nine days for ORRP), catheter removal (6.5 days for LRP vs. 12 days for
ORRP), overall complication rates (29% for LRP vs. 48.4% for ORRP) and blood
transfusion rates (22.7% for LRP and 37.4% for ORRP). Conclusion Both LRP
and ORRP provide favorable operative results in terms of efficacy, safety
and oncologic outcome. However, patients undergoing LRP were more likely to
have less EBL, shorter length of hospital stay, earlier catheter removal and
lower rates of overall perioperative complications.