2018
DOI: 10.20913/1815-3186-2018-4-111-118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The foreign experience analysis of research information support based on bibliometric methods A. S. Pavlova

Abstract: Проанализированы возможности библиометрических методов для информационного сопровождения научных исследований в зарубежных университетах, лидерах по версии мировых рейтингов QS World University Rankings и Academic Ranking of World Universities. Проведенное исследование позволило выделить информационные услуги и информационные продукты, предоставляемые с помощью библиометрических (или наукометрических) данных и методов в зарубежных университетах, дать им характеристику, определить информационные ресурсы и техно… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The H-index has been used by academic societies for measuring and quantifying the scientific output. It has become a fundamental standard method to determine the efficiency of the researchers, scientists, institutions, departments, and universities based on their publications and citations (Pavlova, 2018;Youssef et al, 2021). There have been some efforts to develop other indicators for overcoming the flaws of the h-index, however, it is still the most used parameter for measuring author scientific output (Grech and Rizk, 2018).…”
Section: Authorship Bibliometric Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The H-index has been used by academic societies for measuring and quantifying the scientific output. It has become a fundamental standard method to determine the efficiency of the researchers, scientists, institutions, departments, and universities based on their publications and citations (Pavlova, 2018;Youssef et al, 2021). There have been some efforts to develop other indicators for overcoming the flaws of the h-index, however, it is still the most used parameter for measuring author scientific output (Grech and Rizk, 2018).…”
Section: Authorship Bibliometric Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%