The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations

Abstract

BackgroundThe frequency of outpatient diagnostic errors is challenging to determine due to varying error definitions and the need to review data across multiple providers and care settings over time. We estimated the frequency of diagnostic errors in the US adult population by synthesising data from three previous studies of clinic-based populations that used conceptually similar definitions of diagnostic error.MethodsData sources included two previous studies that used electronic triggers, or algorithms, to detect unusual patterns of return visits after an initial primary care visit or lack of follow-up of abnormal clinical findings related to colorectal cancer, both suggestive of diagnostic errors. A third study examined consecutive cases of lung cancer. In all three studies, diagnostic errors were confirmed through chart review and defined as missed opportunities to make a timely or correct diagnosis based on available evidence. We extrapolated the frequency of diagnostic error obtained from our studies to the US adult population, using the primary care study to estimate rates of diagnostic error for acute conditions (and exacerbations of existing conditions) and the two cancer studies to conservatively estimate rates of missed diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancer (as proxies for other serious chronic conditions).ResultsCombining estimates from the three studies yielded a rate of outpatient diagnostic errors of 5.08%, or approximately 12 million US adults every year. Based upon previous work, we estimate that about half of these errors could potentially be harmful.ConclusionsOur population-based estimate suggests that diagnostic errors affect at least 1 in 20 US adults. This foundational evidence should encourage policymakers, healthcare organisations and researchers to start measuring and reducing diagnostic errors.

Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: variation by patient and facility characteristics

“…Although diagnostic errors -including missed, incorrect, or delayed diagnoses -are common [12] and can be devastating and costly for patients [13], they have received relatively little attention and study from the patient safety community [15,[29][30][31]. The rapid pace and short duration of observation may make patients in EDs particularly vulnerable to diagnostic error.…”

“…Some patients hospitalized with AMI after a treat-andrelease ED visit likely represent missed opportunities for correct diagnosis and treatment [12]. Although the effects of missed AMI diagnoses are not completely understood, some studies have found a nearly two-fold increase in the risk of death [7].…”

Use of an Expedited Review Tool to Screen for Prior Diagnostic Error in Emergency Department Patients

“…As with prior studies [11,14], the range of missed diagnoses was wide, containing both common and rare diagnoses. Unlike prior studies performed within a primary care setting the incidence of missed diagnoses within our targeted case series was relatively low, with only 2.7% of cases positive, as compared to an average population rate of 5.08% in a summative series combining several studies looking at outpatients [19]. Moreover, trials employing similar algorithms to enrich diagnostic errors found rates ranging 5.4-20.4% [11,12].…”

Challenges and opportunities from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) research summit on improving diagnosis: a proceedings review

“…Estimates based on these and other studies suggest that most adults will experience at least one diagnostic error in their lifetimes, sometimes with devastating consequences [2]. Although correct treatment presumes a correct diagnosis, the report noted "federal resources devoted to diagnostic research are vastly eclipsed by those devoted to treatment" [1].…”