2021
DOI: 10.34172/japid.2021.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The frequency of maxillary sinus pathologic findings in cone-beam computed tomography images of patients candidate for dental implant treatment

Abstract: Background. Maxillary sinus pathologic conditions increase the risk of complications during sinus augmentation surgeries in the posterior maxilla. The present study aimed to determine the frequencies of maxillary sinus pathologic findings on patients’ cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images to receive dental implants. Methods. In this descriptive/cross-sectional study, 140 CBCT images of patients who were candidates to receive dental implants were evaluated for the presence of maxillary sinus pathologic en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, a study by Raghav et al 19 201 patients (402 maxillary sinuses) were used. In recent studies, 200 CBCT images (400 maxillary sinuses) were used by Sanaullah et al 13 , and 140 (280 maxillary sinuses) were used by Salari et al 20 Referral reasons were well documented and presented in the present study. It benefits the reader with referral criteria and justification of the localized CBCT examina-tions done in this area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, a study by Raghav et al 19 201 patients (402 maxillary sinuses) were used. In recent studies, 200 CBCT images (400 maxillary sinuses) were used by Sanaullah et al 13 , and 140 (280 maxillary sinuses) were used by Salari et al 20 Referral reasons were well documented and presented in the present study. It benefits the reader with referral criteria and justification of the localized CBCT examina-tions done in this area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…There were other studies with the incidence of pathology within the antra being way higher than the present study (around 56-65%). [19][20][21][22][23] The highest incidence of pathological findings of the maxillary sinuses were found in the study conducted by Rege et al 33 (68.2%). Taking each side of the maxillary sinuses separately (Table 2), apart from PT which showed a massive difference between right and left maxillary sinuses (10 on the right side and 4 on the left side), the incidences and percentages of the other categories were very close.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The presence of Underwood septa might be one of the diagnosed situations in the maxillary sinuses, followed by SSS, accumulation of mucus, formation of a retention cyst, swelling of the mucosa of the maxillary sinus floor, lack of good oroantral drainage, changes in the OMC (osteomeatal complex), or poor sinus ventilation. Each of these findings might impact any further dental procedures, sinus surgery, or other surgical approaches planned in the maxillary sinuses [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. According to Shahidi et al, the amount of maxillary sinus variations in CBCT are common findings, but only their careful radiological evaluation might influence later good clinical and surgical outcome [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Underwood septa (US) can be present in different shapes, sizes, lengths, thicknesses, and locations, while a single septum is the most common one, followed by two septa and rarely more [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. Their occurrence was associated with many possible etiological factors but which were still random in shape and size, although a possible correlation with dental roots and the height of maxillary alveolar bone process is also worth noticing [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation