2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2019.106591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The functional observational battery and modified Irwin test as global neurobehavioral assessments in the rat: Pharmacological validation data and a comparison of methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatively low doses of amphetamine (3 mg/kg) increase spontaneous activity and affect a number of FOB endpoints in the autonomic, neuromuscular, sensorimotor, and behavioral domains in rats. 30 Nirmatrelvir did not affect any FOB endpoints up to 1,000 mg/kg. Although plasma exposures were not directly measured in this study, safety margins were calculated using the maximum plasma concentrations achieved on Day 1 of the corresponding 14-day toxicity study in rats, which was conducted at the same dose levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Relatively low doses of amphetamine (3 mg/kg) increase spontaneous activity and affect a number of FOB endpoints in the autonomic, neuromuscular, sensorimotor, and behavioral domains in rats. 30 Nirmatrelvir did not affect any FOB endpoints up to 1,000 mg/kg. Although plasma exposures were not directly measured in this study, safety margins were calculated using the maximum plasma concentrations achieved on Day 1 of the corresponding 14-day toxicity study in rats, which was conducted at the same dose levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This includes sensory, locomotor, and cognitive functions such as learning, memory and problem solving. 154 Sensory recovery and feedback are important in controlling motor functions, while motor recovery is responsible for initiating muscle fibers to achieve limb movements. 155 Common sensory tests include Von Frey Hair (VFH) microfilament tactile sensory test 156 and heat and cold sensation tests.…”
Section: Summary and Suggestions For Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Принципиальных различий, касающихся набора определяемых параметров, между батареями тестов Ирвина и НФТ нет, хотя НФТ несколько превосходит тесты Ирвина более детальной оценкой сенсомоторных рефлексов и количественного измерения спонтанной активности [15]. В свою очередь, тест Ирвина в авторской интерпретации предусматривает использование большего количества точек регистрации эффектов с учетом времени максимального накопления соединения в плазме крови (T max ) [16].…”
Section: набор функциональных тестов и тесты ирвина применительно к задачам доклинических исследований безопасностиunclassified
“…Можно лишь полагать, что этот тест будет основан на исследовании in vivo, поскольку рассмотрение любого токсического эффекта в отсутствие нейроэндокринной регуляции a priori является неполным и неадекватным. Эта позиция нашла отражение в рекомендациях ICH, подчеркивающих необходимость регистрации эффектов на «функциональном» уровне, а не на уровне функции рецептора 15 .…”
Section: обобщение результатов исследований нейротоксичности в практике доклинических исследованийunclassified