The G20 as an improvised crisis committee and/or a contested ‘steering committee’ for the world

Cooper, Andrew F.

doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00909.x

Cited by 168 publications

(80 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is certainly not due to the design of the organisations themselves: the WTO has proven highly successful in developing formalised, hard-law type trade rules (Jackson 2008); and the G8/G20 summit processes have managed to facilitate a degree of fiscal and monetary coordination during the recent global financial crisis (Cooper 2010). Rather, the answer lies in issues of sovereignty and nationalism unique to energy sectors.…”

Section: The Last Decade Has Seen the Emergence Of Two New Multilatermentioning

confidence: 98%

Multilateral Organisations and the Limits to International Energy Cooperation

Wilson

2014

New Political Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Surging world energy prices, increasing oil market volatility and a nascent 'energy transition' are posing major challenges for global energy governance. In response, there has been a proliferation in the number of multilateral bodies addressing energy issues in recent years, and a wide range of organisations now claim a role in facilitating intergovernmental energy cooperation. However, the practical achievements of these organisations have been very poor, with all suffering difficulties that have limited their ability to promote shared energy interests between states. This article examines the dynamics of multilateral energy organisations, arguing that the political economy features of energysecuritisation and attendant patterns of economic nationalism -explains why they have failed to develop more robust cooperative mechanisms. Ten global-level organisations are evaluated, and found to suffer from either membership, design or commitment issues that limit their effectiveness in global energy governance. These challenges are linked to the securitisation of energy, which has led governments to favour low-cost soft law approaches over potentially more effective hard law institutional designs. Moreover, the securitisation of energy poses limits for how far multilateral energy cooperation can proceed, and means contemporary efforts to strengthen these organisations are unlikely to succeed in coming years.

show abstract

Section: The Last Decade Has Seen the Emergence Of Two New Multilatermentioning

confidence: 98%

Multilateral Organisations and the Limits to International Energy Cooperation

Wilson

2014

New Political Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Andrew Cooper (2010) entiende que el G-20, en lugar de convertirse en un "comité directivo", "serio", con funciones de decisión y gobierno mundial como se había insinuado en las primeras tres cumbres del foro, se tornó en un "improvisado comité de crisis" que desbordó las propuestas de cambio económico-financiero. Por ejemplo, en la octava cumbre, realizada en 2013 en San Petersburgo, Obama llevó el conflicto sirio a o a s i s , N o 2 5 • E n e r o -J u n i o 2 0 1 7 • p p .…”

Section: Desconfianza Y Rechazounclassified

Los países emergentes en el G-20 y la política seguida por Argentina

Miranda¹

2017

oasis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenEn este artículo se analiza la presencia de los países emergentes en la gobernanza global a través de la participación desplegada por ellos en el G-20, con el fin de identificar la posición de Argentina en este ámbito multilateral, y determinar el uso que hizo de su poder como potencia media. Para cumplir con este objetivo consideramos las cumbres de jefes de Estado y de Gobierno del G-20, desde la primera realizada en Washington, en 2008, hasta la novena llevada a cabo en Brisbane, en 2014. Observamos que más allá de las diferencias y disputa de intereses, países desarrollados y emergentes convergieron en sostener las viejas instituciones internacionales como el FMI. Argentina, de participación intensa en las cumbres pero sin una estrategia de influencia, quedó fuera de esta coincidencia y perdió poder en las reformas producidas en los medios multilaterales de crédito.

show abstract

“…Bretton Woods kurumları ile iş birliği arttırılmış ve üye ülkelerin sorunlarını çözmenin yanı sıra dünyanın diğer bölgelerine yapılacak yardımlar da G20'de tartışılmaya başlanmıştır. IMF, Dünya Bankası ve diğer çok taraflı kalkınma bankalarına, üye ülkelerin GSYH'lerinin yüzde 1.8' i kadar fon ayrılması (Cooper, 2010;741) küresel yardımların yapılmasına ivme kazandırmıştır. Böylece G20 kendisini küresel ekonominin yanı sıra küresel yardımlar konusunda da "oyun kurucu" konumuna getirmiştir.…”

Section: Kofi Annanunclassified

Untitled

Al¹,

Kiliç²

2017

SEYAD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Küresel finans krizi sonrası dönemde, küresel ekonomik yönetişimin en güçlü ayağı olarak G20 ön plana çıkmıştır. 2008 Zirvesi ile birlikte liderler kulübüne dönüşen G20, esnek yapısı ve eşitlikçi tartışma ortamı sayesinde küresel yönetişimde yeni güç merkezlerinin ön plana çıkmasını sağlamıştır. Yükselen güçler ve yeni yükselen orta ölçekli güçler olarak adlandırılan ittifaklaşmalar, G20 forumunda "zengin kuzey-fakir güney" ayrımından çok daha kapsamlı bir ekonomik analizin gelişmesine vesile olmuştur. Bu çalışmada, G20 içerisindeki BRICS (Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan, Çin, Güney Afrika) ve MIKTA (Meksika, Endonezya, Güney Kore, Türkiye, Avustralya) gruplarının küresel yönetişimdeki rolleri incelenecektir. Çalışma, küresel yönetişimde değişmesi gereken mekanizmalara karşı revizyonist ve reformist talepleri ortaya koyacaktır. Yükselen ekonomilerin artan güçleri oranında yönetime dâhil olma talepleri ve bu kapsamda elde ettikleri fırsatlar ve çelişkilerin incelenmesi, literatüre "yeni düzen" tartışması bağlamında katkı sağlayacaktır. After the global financial crisis, the G20 as the strongest instrument of global economic governance came to the forefront. With the 2008 Summit, the G20 transformed into a leader's club, enabling new power centers to be at the forefront of global governance, thanks to its flexible structure and equitable discussion environment. Rising powers and newly emerging middle powers forces have led to the development of a much more comprehensive economic analysis in the G20 forum, "rich north-poor south". This study will examine the global governance roles of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) and MIKTA (Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, Turkey, Australia) groups within the G20. The study will present revisionist and reformist claims against the mechanisms that must change in global governance. The examination of the demands for inclusion in governance and the opportunities and contradictions they have gained in the context of the increasing powers of emerging economies will contribute in the context of the literature "new order" debate.

show abstract

The G20 as an improvised crisis committee and/or a contested ‘steering committee’ for the world

Abstract: The G20 as an improvised crisis committee and/or a contested 'steering committee' for the world International Affairs 86: 3 (2010) 741-757

Cited by 168 publications

References 0 publications

Multilateral Organisations and the Limits to International Energy Cooperation

Multilateral Organisations and the Limits to International Energy Cooperation

Los países emergentes en el G-20 y la política seguida por Argentina

Untitled

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About