2022
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) network approach: a protocol to advance stakeholder consensus and research priorities in geriatrics and dementia care in the emergency department

Abstract: IntroductionIncreasingly, older adults are turning to emergency departments (EDs) to address healthcare needs. To achieve these research demands, infrastructure is needed to both generate evidence of intervention impact and advance the development of implementation science, pragmatic trials evaluation and dissemination of findings from studies addressing the emergency care needs of older adults. The Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (https://gearnetwork.org) has been created in response to thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The workgroup, over the course of 6 months, convened videoconference meetings to discuss the scoping review aims, propose the research questions, review the search criteria, and examine the scoping review results, and abstraction of final papers. 7 The Detection workgroup conducted a scoping review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting guidelines 8 used by all 4 workgroups. The Detection workgroup developed key priority questions that were voted on by the entire GEAR 2.0 task force.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The workgroup, over the course of 6 months, convened videoconference meetings to discuss the scoping review aims, propose the research questions, review the search criteria, and examine the scoping review results, and abstraction of final papers. 7 The Detection workgroup conducted a scoping review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting guidelines 8 used by all 4 workgroups. The Detection workgroup developed key priority questions that were voted on by the entire GEAR 2.0 task force.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of manuscripts included people aged !65 years. The number of studies and age criteria were as follows: !18 years (1), !45 years (1), !55 years (1), !60 years (1), !65 years (24), !70 years (4), and !75 years (7).…”
Section: Picomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The workgroup developed 5 key questions that were brought forward for consideration at the GEAR 2.0-ADC Consensus Conference as reported elsewhere. 20 The results of this scoping review and the research objectives were presented at the 2-day virtual consensus conference held on September 10-11, 2021. GEAR 2.0 ADC members who were unable to attend the consensus conference live voted through a REDCap Survey link.…”
Section: Development Of Research Prioritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ED discharge care transitions have been prioritized within the 2014 Geriatric ED Guidelines 13 and the 2018 launch of the American College of Emergency Physicians geriatric ED accreditation process. 14 Recent ED-centric initiatives, as part of the Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research 2.0 Network -Advancing Dementia Care, 15 identified the need for the development of patient-and care partner-reported outcome measures that capture what matters most to stakeholders during ED care transitions. 6,16 As a first step towards developing a novel care partner-reported outcome measure, we sought to assess the barriers experienced by care partners of PLWCI during ED discharge care transitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%