2022
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1019628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The grand challenges facing environmental citizen science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results particularly substantiate the idea of change through knowledge product development based on citizen science data, since knowledge product development and political advancement are closely connected (Section 4.2). This, in turn, is in line with the environmental change literature, which highlights how citizen science can induce change at the policy level (Fritz et al, 2019;Fraisl et al, 2020;Fritz et al, 2022;Sauermann et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussion Of Descriptive Statistics and Factor Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results particularly substantiate the idea of change through knowledge product development based on citizen science data, since knowledge product development and political advancement are closely connected (Section 4.2). This, in turn, is in line with the environmental change literature, which highlights how citizen science can induce change at the policy level (Fritz et al, 2019;Fraisl et al, 2020;Fritz et al, 2022;Sauermann et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussion Of Descriptive Statistics and Factor Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The results are also in line with citizen science evaluations highlighting the role of citizen science in raising awareness of environmental issues (Chase and Levine, 2016;Brouwer et al, 2018;Peter et al, 2019). The results, however, also question the probability of significant middle to long-term impacts of citizen science projects beyond ultimate data outputs (e.g., Fritz et al, 2019;Fraisl et al, 2020;Fritz et al, 2022;Sauermann et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussion Of Descriptive Statistics and Factor Analysissupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Navigating the realm of citizen science and its implications for air quality monitoring, it's clear that while the methodology offers promise, it isn't without its hurdles. Fritz et al, describe challenges for typical citizen science projects across six overarching domains including quality, reliability, and standardization -which are discussed in our results (Fritz et al, 2022) (Wesseling et al, 2019); and utilizing sensor data to quantify pollution during specific events like wildfires (Gupta et al, 2018). These projects demonstrate the power of citizen science for environmental monitoring, data gathering, and policy advocacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It considers different perspectives including those of citizen science researchers and practitioners, NSOs, and international organizations, among others. In line with the frequently cited geographical bias in citizen science studies (Cunha et al 2017;Vasiliades et al 2021;Fritz et al 2022), most papers had authors located in the Global North, particularly Europe (12 papers) and, to a lesser extent, Australia (two papers). Only five papers included authors affiliated to more than one region including the US, South America, Africa, and New Zealand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%