2001
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Home Environments of Children in the United States Part I: Variations by Age, Ethnicity, and Poverty Status

Abstract: Although measures of the home environment have gained wide acceptance in the child development literature, what constitutes the "average" or 'typical" home environment in the United States, and how this differs across ethnic groups and poverty status is not known. Item-level data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth on four age-related versions of the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment-Short Form (HOME-SF) from five biennial assessments (1986-1994) were analyzed for the total sample … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
676
4
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 934 publications
(720 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
34
676
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a decline was observed previously for infants raised in low-income families and communities, independent of chemical exposures, 37,55,56 in part because toddlers from low-income homes have less access to developmentally stimulating environments and may be delayed in acquiring language and problem-solving skills. [57][58][59][60][61][62][63] Although children with low HOME scores did have significantly lower BSID-II scores in this study, there was no indication that the chlorpyrifos effects were either exacerbated or remediated by the quality of the home environment. The finding that a large proportion of children scored in the delayed range on the MDI, although consistent with other reports for similar populations, 64,65 is worrisome, especially because the MDI is often given more importance than the PDI.…”
contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Such a decline was observed previously for infants raised in low-income families and communities, independent of chemical exposures, 37,55,56 in part because toddlers from low-income homes have less access to developmentally stimulating environments and may be delayed in acquiring language and problem-solving skills. [57][58][59][60][61][62][63] Although children with low HOME scores did have significantly lower BSID-II scores in this study, there was no indication that the chlorpyrifos effects were either exacerbated or remediated by the quality of the home environment. The finding that a large proportion of children scored in the delayed range on the MDI, although consistent with other reports for similar populations, 64,65 is worrisome, especially because the MDI is often given more importance than the PDI.…”
contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Poor quality of home environment stimulation can adversely affect children's development, leading to cognitive deficits 22,23 and subsequently to behavioral disorders 37,38 . However, one should bear in mind that the HOME inventory, although widely applied in a variety of cultural backgrounds, may not be perfectly suitable for measuring the quality of the environment of Brazilian children, especially those from low-income families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research conducted to date suggests that Latino parents are less likely than European Americans to become involved in certain kinds of supportive activities with their children. For example, Latino parents are significantly less likely to read to their young children than are European American parents (Bradley et al 2001;Raikes et al 2006). To a large extent, this pattern may be a function of language barriers, low levels of schooling, and lack of knowledge about American education among Latino immigrants (Cooper et al 1999;García Coll et al 2002).…”
Section: High Parental Expectations Foster Parental Involvement In Scmentioning
confidence: 99%