The IHEP Accelerating and Storage Complex (UNK) Status Report

Ageyev, A. I.; Balbekov, V.; Dmitrevsky, Yu. P.; Dunaitsev, A.F.; Fedotov, Yu.S.; Gridasov, V.I.; Komarov, V.V.; Kurnayev, O. V.; Lebedev, V. N.; Logunov, A. A.; Myznikov, K.P.; Naumov, Alexey; Rogozinsky, V. G.; Shembel, B.K.; Soloviev, L. D.; Tarakanov, N.M.; Yarba, V.A.; Artemov, A.D.; Dinaburg, L. D.; Glukhikh, V. A.; Gusev, Oleg; Karasev, V. G.; Kosyakin, M.N.; Malyshev, I. F.; Monoszon, N.A.; Mozalevsky, I. A.; Mozin, I.V.; Peregud, V.; Титов, В. А.; Vasiliev, S. N.; Gyul'khandanyan, A.M.; Makeyev, E. L.; Shiryaev, F. Z.; Vasiliev, A. A.; Vorontsov, G. P.; Kuzmin, A.; Vagin, A.I.; Yelyan, V. V.; Belyakov, V. P.; Butkievich, I. K.; Filin, N. V.; Grigorehko, N. M.; Kovalenko, V. D.; Morkovkin, I. M.

doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-5540-2_8

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other projects included the Fermilab Energy Doubler [15] and the Experimental Superconducting Accelerator Ring (ESCAR) at LBL [16] in the US, IR quadrupoles for the ISR at CERN [17], IR quadrupoles for TRISTAN at KEK [18] and UNK, an accelerator and storage ring complex in the USSR [19]. The UNK magnets were ambitious for the time, with a desired operating field of 5 T and 20% margin.…”

Section: Superconducting Magnets For Particle Acceleratorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators

Rossi

Bottura

2013

Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Superconductivity has been the most influential technology in the field of accelerators in the last 30 years. Since the commissioning of the Tevatron, which demonstrated the use and operability of superconductivity on a large scale, superconducting magnets and rf cavities have been at the heart of all new large accelerators. Superconducting magnets have been the invariable choice for large colliders, as well as cyclotrons and large synchrotrons. In spite of the long history of success, superconductivity remains a difficult technology, requires adequate R&D and suitable preparation, and has a relatively high cost. Hence, it is not surprising that the development has also been marked by a few setbacks.This article is a review of the main superconducting accelerator magnet projects; it highlights the main characteristics and main achievements, and gives a perspective on the development of superconducting magnets for the future generation of very high energy colliders.To be published in Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology, Vol. 5Geneva, Switzerland CERN-ATS-2013-019February 2013 Superconductivity has been the most influential technology in the field of accelerators in the last 30 years. Since the commissioning of the Tevatron, which demonstrated the use and operability of superconductivity on a large scale, superconducting magnets and rf cavities have been at the heart of all new large accelerators. Superconducting magnets have been the invariable choice for large colliders, as well as cyclotrons and large synchrotrons. In spite of the long history of success, superconductivity remains a difficult technology, requires adequate R&D and suitable preparation, and has a relatively high cost. Hence, it is not surprising that the development has also been marked by a few setbacks. This article is a review of the main superconducting accelerator magnet projects; it highlights the main characteristics and main achievements, and gives a perspective on the development of superconducting magnets for the future generation of very high energy colliders.

show abstract

Section: Superconducting Magnets For Particle Acceleratorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators

Rossi

Bottura

2013

Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The basic enabling components of superconducting accelerator magnet technology were in hand, and in the 1970's a number of projects were launched. Among them were the ill-fated ISABELLE at Brookhaven [7], IR quadrupoles for the ISR at CERN [8], TRISTAN at KEK [9], the UNK storage ring in the USSR [10] and the Fermilab Energy Doubler (now referred to as the Tevatron) [11,12]. Since the Tevatron (1983), through HERA (1991) [13] , RHIC (2000) [14] and finally the LHC (2008) [15] all large-scale hadron colliders were built using superconducting magnets based on Nb-Ti.…”

Section: Nb-ti Technologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Superconducting accelerator magnet technology in the 21st century: A new paradigm on the horizon?

Gourlay

2018

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Superconducting magnets for accelerators were first suggested in the mid-60's and have since become one of the major components of modern particle colliders. Technological progress has been slow but steady for the last half-century, based primarily on Nb-Ti superconductor. That technology has reached its peak with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Despite the superior electromagnetic properties of Nb 3 Sn and adoption by early magnet pioneers, it is just now coming into use in accelerators though it has not yet reliably achieved fields close to the theoretical limit. The discovery of the High Temperature Superconductors (HTS) in the late '80's created tremendous excitement, but these materials, with tantalizing performance at high fields and temperatures, have not yet been successfully developed into accelerator magnet configurations. Thanks to relatively recent developments in both Bi-2212 and REBCO, and a more focused international effort on magnet development, the situation has changed dramatically. Early optimism has been replaced with a reality that could create a new paradigm in superconducting magnet technology. Using selected examples of magnet technology from the previous century to define the context, this paper will describe the possible innovations using HTS materials as the basis for a new paradigm.

show abstract

How to measure void fraction of two-phase cryogenic flows

Filippov

2001

Cryogenics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The IHEP Accelerating and Storage Complex (UNK) Status Report

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators

Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators

Superconducting accelerator magnet technology in the 21st century: A new paradigm on the horizon?

How to measure void fraction of two-phase cryogenic flows

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About