2020
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1782832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of content co-creation on academic achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sustainable knowledge co-creation is considered possible (Freeman et al, 2014;Rubio et al, 2020) especially 1) as a superficial change: a co-creation project in which a small group of students' re-design a course previously studied that might not have been updated much in recent years, or 2) as a seismic change: teaching staff modify the entire teaching-learning experience by re-designing the course for each new class of students. The difficulty of implementing this endeavor resides in the fact that knowledge co-creation for a whole class requires the professor to meet the needs of every new group of students, to engage profoundly with each group at every step of their career, and to negotiate with them based on new learning situations (Doyle et al, 2021). This change is shown in the response behavior of the francophone business environment included within this research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainable knowledge co-creation is considered possible (Freeman et al, 2014;Rubio et al, 2020) especially 1) as a superficial change: a co-creation project in which a small group of students' re-design a course previously studied that might not have been updated much in recent years, or 2) as a seismic change: teaching staff modify the entire teaching-learning experience by re-designing the course for each new class of students. The difficulty of implementing this endeavor resides in the fact that knowledge co-creation for a whole class requires the professor to meet the needs of every new group of students, to engage profoundly with each group at every step of their career, and to negotiate with them based on new learning situations (Doyle et al, 2021). This change is shown in the response behavior of the francophone business environment included within this research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…engaging in co-construction of expectations, educators promote student engagement, selfdirection, and academic achievement. 5 While it may be unreasonable to let students decide what questions they will be asked, it is feasible to invite their input on the learning outcomes that are most important to test on an examination. Students may also be invited to have input on the number of questions and examination schedule, which has no negative impact on faculty workload.…”
Section: E25mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Social constructivist learning theory is based on a belief that understanding is a result of active interactions; educators stimulate and facilitate conversations among learners who are active participants and experts in their own quest for knowledge. 5 In academic settings, however, diversity is often ignored as educators base testing on a single empirical perspective. 6 Students have difficulty developing critical thinking, which is an essential cognitive skill for nurses where logical and creative reasoning is used to synthesize information while solving problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, co-creation of content offers benefits such as enhanced student-instructor and studentstudent relationships, [126] increased student satisfaction, [127] and improved academic performance. [128] It can also be an effective vehicle for shifting classroom power dynamics and welcoming students as authorities. [59]…”
Section: Use Socially Relevant Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%