2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-010-9782-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of naturalized legumes on plant communities in Northern Taiwan: are we worrying too much?

Abstract: Habitat transformation caused by naturalized legumes has been considered as a profound environmental threat worldwide. However, the weight of the impact on species diversity of local native and naturalized flora has yet to be revealed. In order to gain a better understanding of the phenomenon, we developed and tested the following hypotheses: (1) naturalized legumes promote local species diversity; (2) naturalized legumes increase local naturalized species diversity rather than native biodiversity; and (3) the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At broader biogeographic scales, the effects of an invader are diffi cult to evaluate since these studies typically use presence/absence data for both the invader and the native species from large, national or global databases such as the IUCN Red List ( Atkinson and Cameron, 1993 ;Lonsdale, 1999 ;Vi é et al, 2008 ; but see, Maskell et al, 2006 ;Vil à et al, 2010 ). From such data, studies often conclude that many naturalized invaders are present, but no native species have gone extinct from the introduction of plant competitors ( Sax et al, 2002 ;Davis, 2003 ;Maskell et al, 2006 ;Sax and Gaines, 2008 ;Tsai et al, 2010 ), even in locations that are infamous for being devastated by species invasions, such as remote oceanic islands (e.g., Hawai'i; Denslow et al, 2009 ). However, the presence and effects of the invader are likely to only occur in a subset of the spatial scales under consideration.…”
Section: Effects Of Invasive Plants Across Spatial Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At broader biogeographic scales, the effects of an invader are diffi cult to evaluate since these studies typically use presence/absence data for both the invader and the native species from large, national or global databases such as the IUCN Red List ( Atkinson and Cameron, 1993 ;Lonsdale, 1999 ;Vi é et al, 2008 ; but see, Maskell et al, 2006 ;Vil à et al, 2010 ). From such data, studies often conclude that many naturalized invaders are present, but no native species have gone extinct from the introduction of plant competitors ( Sax et al, 2002 ;Davis, 2003 ;Maskell et al, 2006 ;Sax and Gaines, 2008 ;Tsai et al, 2010 ), even in locations that are infamous for being devastated by species invasions, such as remote oceanic islands (e.g., Hawai'i; Denslow et al, 2009 ). However, the presence and effects of the invader are likely to only occur in a subset of the spatial scales under consideration.…”
Section: Effects Of Invasive Plants Across Spatial Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes of this study have profound implications for the optimization of rangeland management practices, not only within our study area but also for similar rangelands worldwide. First, they can contribute to design strategies to manage exotic legume species, many of which are planted as forage and can trigger invasion processes (Tsai et al., 2010). Second, knowing the controls of legume abundance can promote sustainable management practices, aimed to jointly improve the conservation and productivity of grasslands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sowing of forage species and fertilization with different nutrients are common practices in rangelands dedicated to livestock production (Hu et al., 2020). In addition, the introduction of forage species, many of which are legumes, can also trigger invasion processes (Tsai et al., 2010), with harmful consequences for the conservation of rangelands and nearby natural areas (Paynter et al., 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation