The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship

Abstract

Stanford Biodesign launched its Innovation Fellowship in 2001 as a first-of-its kind postgraduate training experience for teaching biomedical technology innovators a need-driven process for developing medical technologies and delivering them to patients. Since then, many design-oriented educational programs have been initiated, yet the impact of this type of training remains poorly understood. This study measures the career focus, leadership trajectory, and productivity of 114 Biodesign Innovation Fellowship alumni based on survey data and public career information. It also compares alumni on certain publicly available metrics to finalists interviewed but not selected. Overall, 60% of alumni are employed in health technology in contrast to 35% of finalists interviewed but not selected. On leadership, 72% of alumni hold managerial or higher positions compared to 48% of the finalist group. A total of 67% of alumni reported that the fellowship had been “extremely beneficial” on their careers. As a measure of technology translation, more than 440,000 patients have been reached with technologies developed directly out of the Biodesign Innovation Fellowship, with another 1,000,000+ aided by solutions initiated by alumni after their training. This study suggests a positive impact of the fellowship program on the career focus, leadership, and productivity of its alumni.

Career Trajectory of Physicians Following a Fellowship Program: A Descriptive Study

“…In line with what is mentioned above, and consistent with previous reports about fellowship program graduates' satisfaction, we found a very positive attitude toward the program and its beneficial effects on the physicians' career. 8 Ninety-nine percent answered positively to the question "Would you recommend that a young physician participate in a fellowship program? "…”

Innovation for the future of Irish MedTech industry: retrospective qualitative review of impact of BioInnovate Ireland’s clinical fellows

“…In addition, recently published data from Stanford Biodesign 15 suggest that there is an overall positive impact of their programme on the career trajectory of their fellows. Similarities can be drawn between their analysis and that in BioInnovate Ireland regarding the impact on business strategy skills and teamwork; however, further study of the non-clinical fellows would be required to allow accurate comparisons to be made.…”

Turning Practicing Surgeons Into Health Technology Innovators: Outcomes From the Stanford Biodesign Faculty Fellowship

“…This is a similar ratio of reported gender breakdown as has been previously reported in the flagship Stanford Biodesign Innovation Fellowship. 3 Race was self-reported as white/Caucasian (n = 17, 46%), Asian (n = 14, 38%), Black or African American (n = 3, 8%), Middle Eastern or North African (n = 2, 5%), and Hispanic/Latino (n = 1, 3%). Of the BFFs surveyed, the majority were from medical or surgical specialties (83%, n = 30), with a minority from engineering alone (8%, n = 3) or combined medical and engineering backgrounds (8%, n = 3).…”