1993
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420230509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of salient self‐identities on relative deprivation and action intentions

Abstract: Salient self-identities and their impact upon feelings of relative deprivation ( R D ) and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
90
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
90
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Appelgryn and Bomman (1996) Other researchers have investigated the consequences of temporal relative deprivation for collective self-esteem. Walker (1999) (Ellemers, Wilke, & Van Knippenberg, 1993;Kawakami & Dion, 1993).…”
Section: The Role Of Temporal Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Appelgryn and Bomman (1996) Other researchers have investigated the consequences of temporal relative deprivation for collective self-esteem. Walker (1999) (Ellemers, Wilke, & Van Knippenberg, 1993;Kawakami & Dion, 1993).…”
Section: The Role Of Temporal Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this hypothesis, perceptions of personal deprivation have been found to be related to actions that enhance one's individual status (Hafer & Olson, 1993;Kawakami & Dion, 1993), but unrelated to participation in collective actions (Barnes & Kaase, 1979;Birt & Dion, 1987;Bowen, Bowen, Gawiser & Masotti, 1968;Geschwender & Geschwender, 1973;Muller, 1973;Guimond & Dubé-Simard, 1983;Walker & Mann, 1987;Walker & Pettigrew, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, when a social self-categorization is salient, a personal self-categorization is "perceptually discounted". Indeed, there is support for this inverse relationship in that when a personal self is salient via ingroup comparisons, minority group members take actions to enhance their individual status rather than group actions, and when a social self is salient via intergroup comparisons, they are more likely to take actions to enhance the group status rather than individual actions (Hafer & Olson, 1993;Kawakami & Dion, 1993) . Thus it appears that when one level of the self-categorization is salient, the other is perceptually discounted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%