The individual and integrated impact of Blockchain and IoT on sustainable supply chains:a systematic review

Dutta, Pankaj; Chavhan, Rahul; Gowtham, Pogala; Singh, Amrinder

doi:10.1080/16258312.2022.2082851

Cited by 27 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 159 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Step 4: generalize and categorize codes [11], [16], [24], [30], [38], [40], [41] 2 , [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47] , , [48] 4 , [49], [50], [51] 17 Energy [12], [39] 2 Smart cities [2], [10], [27], [52], [53] 5 Manufacturing and industry 4.0 [13], [17]- [19], [54] 5…”

Section: Surveyed Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(Ec.2) Increased dependability of systems and processes and reputation enhancement [11]: enforcement of service level agreement between participants [13]; product quality ensured by data integrity and traceability [13], [19]; fraud prevention in trade [38]; improved food safety [42]; higher resilience [17]; cyber resiliency [18]; proof of sustainable practices [38]; provenance of products and ingredients/components [38]; transparency and visibility of data provenance [11], [50], [53].…”

Section: (82)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…3) Improved efficiency [42]: traceability and recall efficiency [24], [49]; process efficiency, for example, in sustainable supply chain management [16], smart manufacturing [17], water management [27]; efficient resource allocation and use [38], [50]; reduced transaction delays [14]; increased efficiency in trade contracts and harmonization of conflicting objectives [14]; improve energy efficiency [10]. [2], [11], [53], [59]; boosting the local economy, for example, based on recovered solid waste [2]; extended revenue streams and financing modes [17].…”

Section: (82)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[2], [11], [53], [59]; boosting the local economy, for example, based on recovered solid waste [2]; extended revenue streams and financing modes [17]. 7 (7.1, 7.2), 12 (12.5) Environmental impact (Ev) (Ev.1) Improved measurability and awareness of the environmental impact and enhanced capacities for climate actions: for example, tracking carbon footprints and environmental impacts [27], [50]; facilitating impact assessment and evaluation [27], [38], [48], [53], [59].…”

Section: (82)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…11 (11.6), 12 (12.8), 13 (13.2, 13.3) (Ev.2) Improved monitoring and protection of sustainable use of natural resources and ecosystems, for example, monitoring terrestrial [24], [54], [57] and oceanic ecosystems [16], [38]. 2 (2.3), 13, 14 (14.1-14.5), 15 (15.1-15.7) (Ev.3) Improved resource efficiency and waste reduction: recycling and management [11]; circular economy enabler [17], [59], [60]; reduced food waste [41], [42], [50].…”

Section: (82)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Tertiary Review on Blockchain and Sustainability With Focus on Sustainable Development Goals

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable development is crucial to securing the future of humanity. Blockchain as a disruptive technology and a driver for social change has exhibited great potential to promote sustainable practices and help organizations and governments achieve the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Existing literature reviews on blockchain and sustainability often focus only on topics related to a few SDGs. There is a need to consolidate existing results in terms of SDGs and provide a comprehensive overview of the impacts that blockchain technology may have on each SDG. This paper intends to bridge this gap, presenting a tertiary review based on 42 literature reviews, to investigate the relationship between blockchain and sustainability in light of SDGs. The method used is a consensus-based expert elicitation with thematic analysis. The findings include a novel and comprehensive mapping of impact-based interlinkage of blockchain and SDGs and a systematic overview of drivers and barriers to adopting blockchain for sustainability. The findings reveal that blockchain can have a positive impact on all 17 SDGs though some negative effects can occur and impede the achievement of certain objectives. 76 positive and 10 negative linkages between blockchain adoption and the 17 SDGs as well as 45 factors that drive or hinder blockchain adoption for the achievement of SDGs have been identified. Research gaps to overcome the barriers and enhance blockchain's positive impacts have also been identified. The findings may help managers in evaluating the applicability and tradeoffs, and policymakers in making supportive measures to facilitate sustainability using blockchain.

show abstract

Section: Surveyed Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: (82)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: (82)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: (82)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: (82)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Tertiary Review on Blockchain and Sustainability With Focus on Sustainable Development Goals

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Unlocking the link between low emission supply chains, blockchain adoption, and financial success: The payoff of socially responsible practices in supply chains

Bhattacharjee,

Jahanshahi,

Chakraborty

2024

Bus Strat Dev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The adoption of environmentally and socially responsible practices, particularly in the form of low‐emission supply chain management (LESCM), has become increasingly vital for businesses globally. Renewable energy‐oriented LESCM practices are effective tools for proactive and leading manufacturing organizations, making them socially and environmentally responsible enterprises. In this context, our research focuses on understanding how LESCM implementation by companies may indirectly impact firms' financial success, through facilitating the adoption of blockchain technology (BT). Furthermore, we investigated the impact of the adoption of BT on reducing business operating costs and improving the business's environmental performance. To answer these research questions, we have used survey data from 189 Bangladeshi manufacturing firms, a developing country facing unique challenges and opportunities in the realm of sustainable business practices. Through rigorous analysis and robust statistical methods, we substantiate our hypotheses, shedding light on the positive associations between LESCM practices, BT adoption, financial performance, cost reduction, and environmental sustainability.

show abstract

Assessing the impact of blockchain technology on the overall performance of sustainable supply chains: an analytical perspective

Sahabuddin,

Tan,

Khokhar

et al. 2023

Environ Sci Pollut Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The individual and integrated impact of Blockchain and IoT on sustainable supply chains:a systematic review

Cited by 27 publications

References 159 publications

A Tertiary Review on Blockchain and Sustainability With Focus on Sustainable Development Goals

A Tertiary Review on Blockchain and Sustainability With Focus on Sustainable Development Goals

Unlocking the link between low emission supply chains, blockchain adoption, and financial success: The payoff of socially responsible practices in supply chains

Assessing the impact of blockchain technology on the overall performance of sustainable supply chains: an analytical perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About