The influence of knowledge management to integrated design

Rahmawati, Yuni; Utomo, Christiono

doi:10.1109/icitacee.2014.7065740

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Han et al [6] built a dynamic system to estimate the negative impact of design errors. Knowledge management and the decision support for design process [15][16][17]. Love et al [8], analyze the design errors and prevention efforts.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors of Design Errors in Construction Project (A Review)

Fuadie

Rahmawati

Utomo

2017

IJPS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design is an important step in construction project. Errors in design cause failure in construction stage as well as the project development. Misunderstandings of design concept between parties lead to design errors that able to decrease the quality of construction works, and also cause cost overruns and project delays. Design errors also contribute to engineering failures, which can result in accidents and loss of life. Preventive actions in reducing the errors are necessary. In accordance with these issues, this research is conducted with main purpose to identify the causal factors of design error. Review to previous studies with main topic of design error was taken in order to identify the causal factors. The factors were then validated in an oil and gas industry through observation in design process and also interview to parties whom have experiences in design process. Based from research, it is found that there are 5 main causal factors. The factors are man, method, material, machine, and environment. There are also several factors that are less in accordance with the conditions in the field such as cognitive dissonance, competitive tendering, and adversarial attitudes. By knowing the cause of the design error, can be done to prevent the effort of guarantee project sustainability.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors of Design Errors in Construction Project (A Review)

Fuadie

Rahmawati

Utomo

2017

IJPS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…regulations and requirements. The knowledge is included as intangible aspect, where it is also classified into tacit and explicit knowledge [8], meanwhile the tangible aspect consist of design drawings, and the results of design developments.…”

Section: Conceptual Framework Of Collaborative Decisionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative Decision for Building Energy System on Traditional Markets in Urban Areas

Utomo

Rahmawati

Negoro

2017

IJPS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It becomes more important to design energy-efficient for buildings. This is true in relationship to a public building design especially retail property such as traditional market. It calculates the use of energy during construction and operation. There are three alternatives for a building energy system which are passive energy, electrical equipment, and user processes. The alternatives are developed for a public commercial retail. They were selected by four stakeholders named government, tenant, designer, and property manager. It is not easy to make a decision where there are many stakeholders' interests. A decision support system is necessary. The system should support a collaborative process among decision makers. This paper presents a multi criteria and multi person decision process to develop agreement options and coalition formation to find the best fit option of the energy system for traditional markets building in urban areas. There are three stages involved in the process which are first is determining and scoring of every alternative for every stakeholder, second is determining the optimal solution (payoff optimum) for each stakeholder in a coalition, and third is analyzing the best fit options for every coalition and grand coalition. An analytical hierarchy process (AHP) based on satisfying option is applied for the first stage. A liner programming is used to determine payoff optimum in the stage two and an agent system based on game theory built the coalition algorithm on the stage three. The result shows a model of collaborative decision to select a building system at design process.

show abstract

“…can, thus, easily produce a fine design of commercial properties. Communication is the basic foundation for the collaboration of 2 of 19 these firms [2]. The negotiation process is also a major factor in collaboration success in terms of achieving the finest design.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

BIM and E-Negotiation Practices in AEC Consulting Businesses

2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Architectural, engineering, and construction (AEC) consulting businesses are developing into a specialized industry, and collaborative decision making is essential to obtain the finest design. Everything is now virtual. Building information modelling (BIM) has the most potential to support current practices. BIM is promising for effective and efficient design processes. Negotiation and decision-making processes appear to be activities that are the most difficult for BIM to facilitate. Both activities are hard to complete in person and virtually. Every participant has their own preferences, intention, and pay-off optimum, and conflicts are difficult to avoid. Communication and e-negotiation are main issues in BIM practices. This paper proposes BIM and e-negotiation practices in AEC consulting businesses, with the main intention to reveal critical success factors that enhance the utilization of BIM in supporting communication and e-negotiation. A survey through observation and questionnaire distribution was used to collect the data. Descriptive analysis through a mean and standard deviation scatter plot was used to analyse the data. Two hundred and two respondents consisting of 91 design managers (leaders) and 111 designers/consultants (non-leaders) were involved in the research. Based on the analysis, it was found that there are different perceptions between those two groups. The design managers stated that they were the most vital factor in supporting the e-negotiation in BIM, whereas the consultants (designers) stated that job description was the main essential factor.

show abstract

The influence of knowledge management to integrated design

Cited by 7 publications

References 38 publications

Factors of Design Errors in Construction Project (A Review)

Factors of Design Errors in Construction Project (A Review)

Collaborative Decision for Building Energy System on Traditional Markets in Urban Areas

BIM and E-Negotiation Practices in AEC Consulting Businesses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About