2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of surfactant head group on miscibility in mixed hydrocarbon-perfluorocarbon monolayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The height profiles illustrate that, in both alcohols, the height of the visible domains is comparable to the length of the fully extended molecules (~1.8 nm for F14OH [ 44 ] and ~2.5 nm for F18OH [ 37 ]) within the experimental error. This is an indication that the molecules within the aggregates are perpendicular to the underlying substrate in agreement with the GIXD results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The height profiles illustrate that, in both alcohols, the height of the visible domains is comparable to the length of the fully extended molecules (~1.8 nm for F14OH [ 44 ] and ~2.5 nm for F18OH [ 37 ]) within the experimental error. This is an indication that the molecules within the aggregates are perpendicular to the underlying substrate in agreement with the GIXD results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This intrinsic “antipathy” between hydrogenated and perfluorinated substances has been the basis for a number of studies on the segregation and 2D phase-separation in Langmuir films of mixtures of hydrogenated and perfluorinated carboxylic acids [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ] and alcohols [ 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of our works to date have emphasized the impact of tail length on pattern formation, but we have just recently begun to investigate the effects of surfactant headgroups. We have started by examining the behavior of a mixed monolayer consists of nonadecanol (C18H-ol) and our benchmark C13F and compared results with the fatty acid analogue of the hydrocarbon component (nonadecanoic acid, C18H) . Although the thermodynamic differences in mixing behavior attributed to headgroup interactions between these two systems were minimal, there were notable differences in film morphology.…”
Section: Morphology Study Of Hydrocarbon–fluorocarbon Mixed Monolayersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(A) Pure C18H-ol, (B) pure C18H, (C) C18H-ol-C13F (H:F = 4:1), (D) C18H–C13F (H:F = 4:1), and (E) pure C13F, deposited at π = 30 mN m –1 and T = 22 ± 1 °C. Reprinted with permission from ref . Copyright 2018 Elsevier.…”
Section: Morphology Study Of Hydrocarbon–fluorocarbon Mixed Monolayersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examinations of the π-A isotherms of single and mixed SA/PFTA and C18OH/PFTA monolayers ( Figure 2) are helpful for studying their phase behaviors on aqueous subphases. At the air-pure water interface (Figure 2a), compression of the SA monolayer exhibited typical phase behavior of fatty acids (Griffith et al, 2012;Sowah-Kuma & Paige, 2018). The isotherm started with a gaseous-tilted condensed (G-TC) coexistence phase and entered a tilted condensed (TC) phase after being compressed to the lift-off area of 32.8 Å 2 /molecule.…”
Section: Surface Pressure-area (π-A) Isothermmentioning
confidence: 99%