2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the crystal structure of TiO2 support material on Pd catalysts for formic acid electrooxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forward peak current on the commercial 30 wt % Pd/C­(Aldrich) catalyst is 722 mA·mg –1 , similar to the previous report in the literature . The mass activity of the TiO 2 (001)@Pd­(111) catalyst is 5.8 times that of the impregnated Pd/TiO 2 (001) catalyst (1121 vs 194 mA·mg –1 ), which is much higher than other TiO 2 -supported palladium catalysts reported in the literature. It should be noted that our TiO 2 (001)@Pd­(111) catalyst also exhibits 1.5 times the mass activity as that on a commercial Pd/C catalyst with similar palladium loading. Moreover, the forward peak potential of the TiO 2 (001)@Pd­(111) catalyst is situated at 0.20 V (marked with vertical dashed lines in Figure ), ∼20 mV more negative compared to the commercial Pd/C catalyst, indicating that the TiO 2 (001)@Pd­(111) catalyst has faster kinetics than the commercial Pd/C catalyst.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The forward peak current on the commercial 30 wt % Pd/C­(Aldrich) catalyst is 722 mA·mg –1 , similar to the previous report in the literature . The mass activity of the TiO 2 (001)@Pd­(111) catalyst is 5.8 times that of the impregnated Pd/TiO 2 (001) catalyst (1121 vs 194 mA·mg –1 ), which is much higher than other TiO 2 -supported palladium catalysts reported in the literature. It should be noted that our TiO 2 (001)@Pd­(111) catalyst also exhibits 1.5 times the mass activity as that on a commercial Pd/C catalyst with similar palladium loading. Moreover, the forward peak potential of the TiO 2 (001)@Pd­(111) catalyst is situated at 0.20 V (marked with vertical dashed lines in Figure ), ∼20 mV more negative compared to the commercial Pd/C catalyst, indicating that the TiO 2 (001)@Pd­(111) catalyst has faster kinetics than the commercial Pd/C catalyst.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For instance, the high operational potentials limit the use of carbon based support materials in SPEWEs, the most common material support used in fuel cells, because degradation and loss of electrical contact with the electroactive material is typically observed. Therefore, the catalyst support materials should possess several important features: (i) a highly superficial surface to allow for good dispersion of the catalyst nanoparticles, (ii) a high electrical conductivity to allow for efficient transport of electrons to the ions involved in the electrochemical reactions, (iii) mechanical and chemical stability, and (iv) a good metal support interaction to improve the intrinsic catalytic activity of the catalyst phase [13,14]. The support materials that have been studied for OER are based on oxides and other ceramics, which include Ti n O 2n-1 [14], TiC, SiC-Si, SnO 2 [15,16] and Sb-SnO 2 [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enhanced catalytic property of Pd/CMRT mainly arised from the improved electronic conductivity of the carbon-modified rutile TiO2, the dilated lattice constant of Pd nanoparticles, an increasing of surface steps and kinks in the microstructure of Pd nanoparticles and slightly better tolerance to the adsorption of poisonous intermediates [107]. Wang et al [108] investigated the influence of the crystal structure of TiO2 supporting material on formic acid oxidation. TiO2 with the rutile structure improved the catalytic activity of Pd nanoparticles toward formic acid oxidation.…”
Section: Pd Supported On Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%