2014
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Insight ToolKit image registration framework

Abstract: Publicly available scientific resources help establish evaluation standards, provide a platform for teaching and improve reproducibility. Version 4 of the Insight ToolKit (ITK4) seeks to establish new standards in publicly available image registration methodology. ITK4 makes several advances in comparison to previous versions of ITK. ITK4 supports both multivariate images and objective functions; it also unifies high-dimensional (deformation field) and low-dimensional (affine) transformations with metrics that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
434
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 551 publications
(435 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
434
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison across participants, we created a study‐specific FA‐template based on all available images using Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) algorithms (Avants et al., 2014; Lawson, Duda, Avants, Wu, & Farah, 2013), which showed the highest accuracy in software comparisons (Klein et al., 2009; Murphy et al., 2011; Tustison et al., 2014). Individual images were transformed to template space using non‐linear registration with symmetric diffeomorphic normalization as implemented in ANTs (Avants, Epstein, Grossman, & Gee, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison across participants, we created a study‐specific FA‐template based on all available images using Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) algorithms (Avants et al., 2014; Lawson, Duda, Avants, Wu, & Farah, 2013), which showed the highest accuracy in software comparisons (Klein et al., 2009; Murphy et al., 2011; Tustison et al., 2014). Individual images were transformed to template space using non‐linear registration with symmetric diffeomorphic normalization as implemented in ANTs (Avants, Epstein, Grossman, & Gee, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precise comparisons between different tongue images, including the definition of a standard X-Y template, will require local warping and alignment of images that differ due to biological variation and the effects of sample preparation. Algorithms that warp and align images to match a template have been developed for brain histology and magnetic resonance imaging (Avants et al, 2014;Economo et al, 2016) and might be adaptable to tongue images. If these technical challenges can be met, it should be possible to generate LP vector maps at single LP resolution and to compare WT and mutant maps to reveal the magnitude and statistical significance of variation in LP orientation at every X-Y location.…”
Section: The Tongue Epithelium As a System For Quantitative Analysis mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is built on the widely used Insight ToolKit (ITK) [20], and is open source and freely available. Each of the cohort MDTs was constructed using the Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs; stnava.github.io/ANTs/) software package and accompanying scripts (at commit: 88276f8).…”
Section: Template Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%