2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11151-020-09759-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Intellectual Property-Antitrust Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical evidence indicates that 'antitrust' is a growing field and requires future researchers to investigate this scarcely explored theme in more detail and with a multisided approach. Though cases are being discussed in the literature on antitrust [106,115] the problem persists regarding rules, regulations and operating laws whether multisided markets can be treated with existing laws for single-sided markets, or a new set of procedures and laws need to be devised. The purpose of antitrust laws should be to maintain a level playing field for all players in the market and create a free and fair competition but the non-price-based competition and acquisitions by big players is a growing concern, which could lead to monopolistic practices within the ecosystem boundaries.…”
Section: Network Effects Cluster (Yellow) Frd: Antitrustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical evidence indicates that 'antitrust' is a growing field and requires future researchers to investigate this scarcely explored theme in more detail and with a multisided approach. Though cases are being discussed in the literature on antitrust [106,115] the problem persists regarding rules, regulations and operating laws whether multisided markets can be treated with existing laws for single-sided markets, or a new set of procedures and laws need to be devised. The purpose of antitrust laws should be to maintain a level playing field for all players in the market and create a free and fair competition but the non-price-based competition and acquisitions by big players is a growing concern, which could lead to monopolistic practices within the ecosystem boundaries.…”
Section: Network Effects Cluster (Yellow) Frd: Antitrustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antitrust law aims to promote competition and static welfare. In contrast, IP law permits static welfare losses in exchange for dynamic welfare gains, see Blair et al (2020). Thus, there is an apparent trade-off between both approaches that is of key relevance for public authorities.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%