Photosynthesis: From Light to Biosphere 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-0173-5_1135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interactive Effects of Elevated CO2 and O3 Concentration on Photosynthesis in Spring Wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
86
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
12
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is probably the result of a decrease in stomatal conductance in all six species in the elevated compared with the ambient CO # treatments, which resulted in lower O $ uptake (Reich & Amundson, 1985 ;Reich, 1987), supporting hypothesis number one. Similar results were found by McKee et al (1995) and Volin & Reich (1996), but not by Barnes et al (1995) and Kull et al (1996).…”
Section: Cosupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is probably the result of a decrease in stomatal conductance in all six species in the elevated compared with the ambient CO # treatments, which resulted in lower O $ uptake (Reich & Amundson, 1985 ;Reich, 1987), supporting hypothesis number one. Similar results were found by McKee et al (1995) and Volin & Reich (1996), but not by Barnes et al (1995) and Kull et al (1996).…”
Section: Cosupporting
confidence: 86%
“…McKee, Farage & Long (1995), Fangmeier et al (1996), andVolin &Reich (1996) have shown an amelioration of the phytotoxic effects of high O $ on plant growth and physiology in an enriched CO # atmosphere. By contrast, Kull et al (1996) showed no amelioratory effect of O $ in high CO # , but their results indicate a greater plant sensitivity to O $ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a significant increase in the number of branches (P 0.01) and a decrease in specific leaf area (P 0.01) with elevated CO # , but no significant increase in plant height, number of leaves and absolute leaf area. This supports the general observation that an increase in atmospheric CO # concentration enhances overall plant growth (McKee et al, 1995 ;Long et al, 1996 ;Mulholland et al, 1998). The higher specific leaf area exhibited by the plants grown at 360 µmol mol −" CO # compared with those grown at 720 µmol mol −" CO # suggests that the former plants might have thinner leaves.…”
Section: Morphological and Anatomical Differencessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The reduced quantum yield of PSII electron transport appears to be another non-stomatal factor responsible for the genetic difference among the cultivars. Therefore, the larger decline of g s and increase of L s in Y19, Y2 and Y15 were the result rather than the cause of the O 3 -induced A sat , which is also supported by previous chamber studies (Fiscus et al, 1997;McKee et al, 1995). Among all antioxidant variables tested in this study, APX, POD, SOD, GSH, Phenolics and AsA showed significant difference among cultivars (P b 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The larger decline in V cmax compared to J max (V cmax /J max ) of Y19 underlined the paramount importance of the Rubisco linked photochemical reactions among the non-stomatal factors. This view is supported by previous wheat studies that the greater reduction in A sat in E-O 3 was related to a reduction of Rubisco activity (Farage and Long, 1999;Inada et al, 2012;McKee et al, 1995). The effects of E-O 3 on photoinhibition was significant for Y19, Y2 and Y15 at the final measurement date as represented by reduced AQY (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%