1989
DOI: 10.3109/15569548909059766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The International Mycotoxin Check Sample Programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be due to the use of TLC which is know n to be less speci® c than H PLC or ELISA m ethods for the analysis of traces of a¯atoxin M 1 (i.e. under the mg/ kg-level) and often leads to w idespread results in the a¯atoxin M 1 content in samples (Friesen 1989). The only labora tory using an ELISA test obtaine d`questionable' z-scores precisely located on the line between acceptable and questionable scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This could be due to the use of TLC which is know n to be less speci® c than H PLC or ELISA m ethods for the analysis of traces of a¯atoxin M 1 (i.e. under the mg/ kg-level) and often leads to w idespread results in the a¯atoxin M 1 content in samples (Friesen 1989). The only labora tory using an ELISA test obtaine d`questionable' z-scores precisely located on the line between acceptable and questionable scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This could be due to the use of TLC which is known to be less speci® c than H PLC or ELISA m ethods for the analysis of traces of a¯atoxin M 1 (i.e. under the mg/ kg-level) and often leads to w idespread results in the a¯atoxin M 1 content in samples (Friesen 1989). The only labora tory using an ELISA test obtaine d`questionable' z-scores precisely located on the line between acceptable and question able scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%