2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980010000157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The International Physical Activity Questionnaire modified for the elderly: aspects of validity and feasibility

Abstract: Objective: To modify the self-administered, short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) for adults to be used in the elderly (aged 65 years and above), and to validate this modified IPAQ for the elderly (IPAQ-E). Design: A direct validity study using accelerometer-measured physical activity (PA) as the criterion measure, and an indirect criterion validity study using highsensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a biological marker of activity. Setting: Organisations for retired … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
175
1
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
175
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Different results were obtained by Hurtig-Wennlof and Hagstromer [20], who observed the recommended physical activity in up to 87% of seniors in Sweden; the research, however, concerned a much smaller group (n = 54) compared to other presented analyses in which the number of examined ranged from 200 -900 seniors. Moreover, in all the abovequoted studies, different criteria were used to verify the activity of the various levels of intensity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different results were obtained by Hurtig-Wennlof and Hagstromer [20], who observed the recommended physical activity in up to 87% of seniors in Sweden; the research, however, concerned a much smaller group (n = 54) compared to other presented analyses in which the number of examined ranged from 200 -900 seniors. Moreover, in all the abovequoted studies, different criteria were used to verify the activity of the various levels of intensity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Moreover, in all the abovequoted studies, different criteria were used to verify the activity of the various levels of intensity. Tucker and Welk [21], for the level of MVPA accepted values of >2020 counts/ min, while Harrisand Owen [17] >2,000 counts/min, Davis and Fox [18] >1,952 counts/min, Colley and Garriguet [19] >1,535 count/min, and Hurtig-Wennlof and Hagstromer [20] > 760 count/min. The inclusion of such low value probably contributed to the high proportion of Swedish seniors meeting the criteria for health-enhancing physical activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the physical activity of each participant, two questionnaires were usedInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire for Elderly (IPAQ-E) [14] and a modified version of Social Determinants of Health Behaviours [15]. IPAQ-E questionnaire consists of four questions regarding the physical activity in the last seven days -time spent sitting, time spent walking, time spent doing moderate physical activities and time spent doing vigorous physical activities.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 3 measurements made for each participant the highest value was used for this study. The main study factors were as follows: (a) physical exercise, assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and daily hours walked outdoors (www.ipaq.ki.se) [13]; (b) nutritional status, assessed by anthropometric measurements (weight, height, body mass index), recent weight loss and the short-form Mini Nutritional Assessment questionnaire; (c) comorbidities (arthrosis, diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, heart failure, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney failure, chronic liver disease, Parkinson disease, depression, etc); (d) anabolic hormone levels, namely, fasting plasma levels of total ghrelin, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), testosterone and insulin determined using validated commercial kits; (e) inflammatory markers, namely, fasting plasma levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein, determined using validated commercial kits; and (f) frailty phenotype, whereby participants were classified as robust, pre-frail or frail if they fulfilled 0, 1-2 or ≥3, respectively, of the following five Fried criteria: unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slow walking speed and poor grip strength [5]. Other study variables included sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, education level); chronic medication; appetite and satiety assessed by means of a visual analogue scale; functional capacity assessed by the Barthel index, timed up-and-go test, single-leg stance test, falls and gait speed; and, finally, a complete blood count and basic blood biochemical analyses for glucose, creatinine, albumin and lipid profile.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%