The Internet of Things: Foundational ethical issues

Allhoff, Fritz; Henschke, Adam

doi:10.1016/j.iot.2018.08.005

Cited by 79 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Another issue evolves from the constrained nature of the devices when it comes to updating the limited firmware of these low-powered sensors. It is impractical, due to the lack of power and implications on battery life for the device, to connect to a cloud service routinely and check if new firmware needs to be downloaded and installed on the device (Chiang and Zhang 2016;Yaqoob et al 2017;Allhoff and Henschke 2018). This leads to a scenario where devices could potentially be operating with outdated firmware, thereby leaving them vulnerable to security breaches.…”

Section: Device Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

IoT reliability: a review leading to 5 key research directions

Moore¹,

Nugent²,

Zhang³

et al. 2020

CCF Trans. Pervasive Comp. Interact.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Internet of Things (IoT) is rapidly changing the way in which we engage with technology on a daily basis. The IoT paradigm enables low-resource devices to intercommunicate in a fully flexible and pervasive manner, and the data from these devices is used for decision-making in critical applications such as; traffic infrastructure, health-care and home security, to name but a few. Due to the scarce resources available in these IoT devices, being able to quantify the reliability of them is a critical function. This report presents a detailed evolution of the area of reliability measurement, followed by an in-depth review of the state-of-the-art for quantification of reliability in the IoT, revealing the many challenges associated with this task. From this in-depth review, a set of key research directions for IoT reliability is determined. Despite the critical nature of the research area, at this current moment, this study is the first detailed review available in the area of assessing IoT reliability.

show abstract

Section: Device Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

IoT reliability: a review leading to 5 key research directions

Moore¹,

Nugent²,

Zhang³

et al. 2020

CCF Trans. Pervasive Comp. Interact.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…“Smart” often refers to energy efficiency, but it can also suggest a high level of sophistication of communication between the devices in the network, sensitivity, and responsiveness to changes in the environment (often involving AI and machine learning) as well as referring to the insights that can be garnered from the reams of digital data generated, processed, and exchanged by the technologies (Allhoff & Henschke, ; Gram‐Hanssen & Darby, ). In these representations, smart things are often portrayed as possessing agencies distinct from the humans who are parts of their assemblages (Gram‐Hanssen & Darby, ).…”

Section: Techno‐utopian Imaginariesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Internet of Things: Social dimensions

Lupton

2020

Sociology Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a vast, dispersed system in which a diverse array of objects, humans, and other living things is connected via “smart” technologies and the Internet. In this article, I present a thematic review of the literature that focuses on the social dimensions of the IoT. Drawing on research published in sociology, anthropology, cultural geography, critical urban studies, science and technology studies, environmental studies, and human–computer interaction studies and design, I outline key conceptual approaches and then discuss four major themes emerging across these dispersed but cognate literatures: (a) techno‐utopian imaginaries, (b) risks and harms, (c) lived experiences, and (d) interventions into futures. As I show, to date, most of the social research literature has focused on the topics of smart cities and smart homes in the context of the Global North. Some researchers have begun to employ innovative methods to generate new and alternative ways of imagining IoT technologies. The article concludes with proposing directions for future research. These include directing more attention to publics' role in intervening in the futures of IoT, to applications of smart technologies beyond the smart city and home, and the IoT in the context of the Global South.

show abstract

“…Как философское понятие «защита ПД» может относиться к набору связанных, но разделяемых понятий [6], отслеживающих как описательные, так и нормативные компоненты [7,8]. Защита ПД означает, что секретная информация об отдельных лицах или группах не раскрывается другим лицам.…”

Section: защита персональных данных в Cpsunclassified

“…Хотя в некоторых контекстах защита ПД и конфиденциальность частично совпадают, они отличаются с точки зрения их концепций и методов защиты. Конфиденциальность рассматривается как «ориентированная на данные» концепция, которая означает, что речь идет о самих данных с целью обеспечения того, чтобы данные были известны только уполномоченным сторонам [8]. Тогда как защита ПД включает в себя дополнительную концепцию, «ориентированную на владельцев данных», которые могут быть отдельными лицами или группами, с целью защиты их частной информации при использовании их данных для анализа [8].…”

Section: "İnformasiya Təhlükəsizliyinin Aktual Multidissiplinar Elmi-unclassified

Вопросы Защиты Персональных Данных В Киберфизических Системах

Сухостат¹,

Нана²

2019

İnformasiya Təhlükəsizliyinin Aktual Multidissiplinar Elmi-Praktiki Problemləri v Respublika Konfransının Materialları

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Personal data protection issues specific to cyber-physical systems are one of the relevant areas of scientific research. The paper presents an analysis of existing issues of personal data protection in cyber-physical systems. The technologies and types of threats to which they are exposed are considered. Some solutions to this complex research field are presented. Also, open directions for future research with the aim of privacy that can help researchers to develop new approaches in protecting against threats to cyber-physical systems are considered.

show abstract

The Internet of Things: Foundational ethical issues

Cited by 79 publications

References 22 publications

IoT reliability: a review leading to 5 key research directions

IoT reliability: a review leading to 5 key research directions

The Internet of Things: Social dimensions

Вопросы Защиты Персональных Данных В Киберфизических Системах

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About