The intertwining of knowledge sharing and creation in the digital platform based ecosystem. A conceptual study on the lens of the open innovation approach

Abstract

Purpose Generally, there is a common sense to consider knowledge sharing and creation as two separate processes but a new matter emerges when those processes are intertwining. In this vein, this research aims to discuss on the lens of the open innovation (OI) model how such intertwining generates digital platform-based ecosystem. Design/methodology/approach The theoretical approach is used to largely discuss the intertwining of knowledge sharing and creation in the current digital era. It debates such scenario considering past and present studies and suggests future research streamlines. Findings It offers a new theoretical model that can be implemented in a micro, meso and macro level where the concept of “ba” (or ba-sho) assumes the form of a digital platform where knowledge sharing is in motion and dynamically interacts with the knowledge creation. Originality/value By discussing the intertwining of knowledge creation and sharing in OI context along with digital trends (e.g. platform innovation ecosystems and platform innovation management), the study offers a new conceptual framework that relies on such intertwining accompanied by the concept of “ba – sho.” In this vein, research limits and new research are suggested to demonstrate and support this conceptual study.

International open innovation and international market success: an empirical study of emerging market small and medium-sized enterprises

“…Considering the momentum of the internet of things (IoTs), platforms and digital ecosystemswhich are changing the nature of IOI (cf. West, 2014) -ESMEs can benefit from the international exchange of knowledge by building their digital alliance capabilities (Bereznoy et al, 2021;Santoro et al, 2018). Accordingly, this study draws from this logic to examine the potential moderating role played by digital alliance capabilities on the hypothesized relationship between IOI and international market success of ESMEs.…”

Digital Entrepreneurship Services Evolution: Analysis of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Models for Open Data Ecosystems

“…Public sector organizations and businesses publish data to nascent entrepreneurs to create platforms and develop digital services to enhance the quality of citizens' lives. Regarding the social motivation, the government publishes data to decrease bureaucracy and increase accountability, transparency, and participation in government [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Furthermore, [16] highlighted some advantages for citizens.…”

The impact of knowledge flows on asset specificity from the perspective of open innovation

“…Furthermore, the results show that outbound knowledge flows result in higher investments in asset specificity, but requires stronger innovation control compared to coupled knowledge flows. This is supported by the existing studies that commonly acknowledge that the most obvious issues regarding outbound knowledge flows is the risk of leaking valuable innovations to the competition and thereby losing their competitive advantages because of poor management and collaboration with external partners (Laursen and Salter, 2006a;Bereznoy et al, 2021).…”

“…The concept of open innovation has also helped firms shift R&D activities away from the internal discovery toward external engagement . Since Chesbrough's (2003) introduction of the open innovation concept, its literature has covered various topics, including areas for adopting open innovation (Schroll and Mild, 2011), knowledge flows or innovation processes (Gassmann and Enkel, 2004;Enkel et al, 2009;Dahlander and Gann, 2010;Frey et al, 2011;Moellers et al, 2020), forms of openness (Dahlander and Gann, 2010;Kratzer et al, 2017;O ¨berg and Alexander, 2019), required capabilities (Castro, 2005;Ahn et al, 2016;Scuotto et al, 2020), knowledge management and operational practices (Lopes et al, 2017;Dezi et al, 2018;Santoro et al, 2018;Abdulkader et al, 2020;Bereznoy et al, 2021) and impacts on firms' innovative and overall performance (Laursen and Salter, 2006b;Dahlander and Gann, 2010;Bianchi et al,…”