The involvement of utilities in the development of broadband infrastructure: A comparison of EU case studies

Abstract

Energy companies and other utility providers have been often involved in the provision of telecommunications services. Nevertheless, their contribution to broadband development has varied significantly over time. In the late 1990s, both local and national utilities in the European Union (EU) engaged in the provision of broadband networks, but only few of them managed to establish themselves as major broadband providers. More recently, new projects involving national utilities have been announced in several EU countries, opening new scenarios for utilities' contribution to Next Generation Access (NGA) development. This paper identifies and explores the factors affecting the entry and the success of utilities in the EU broadband market, through the comparison of four case studies from four EU countries (Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK). The evolution of utility involvement in the EU broadband markets is assessed against the interaction of market, technology and policy factors, focusing on the impact of policy and regulatory measures. As a result, this paper provides fruitful insights into the relevance and effectiveness of public interventions in broadband markets. Across the four case studies, public support and public ownership emerged as the main drivers for the involvement of utilities in EU broadband markets, with regulatory measures and economies of scope exerting a limited and decreasing influence. However, the contribution of utilities has varied significantly across the cases studied, reflecting the different approaches taken at national and local level to support broadband development, in spite of the common regulatory framework.

WiFi4EU: Techno-economic analysis of a key European Commission initiative for public connectivity

“…EU Member States are using an array of public policy instruments to improve broadband availability and are taking steps to make these improvements in a variety of different ways as there is no one single European policy to promote broadband (Cava-Ferreruela & Alabau-Munoz, 2005). A great number of initiatives have emerged to achieve the coverage targets set by the Digital Agenda (Gerli et al, 2017). In 2009, the European Commission also adopted Guidelines for State Aid in broadband markets to ensure that public interventions in this market are permitted.…”

“…c) It needs to conciliate with municipal plans for large scale broadband development and alternative infrastructure providers that may also contribute to network developments (Gerli, Van der Wee, Verbrugge & Whalley, 2017):…”

Does the Multilevel Governance of State Aid Encourage Broadband Diffusion? Evidence from Three European Countries

“…Other scholars have explored the conflictual nature of the relationship between national and EU authorities in the context of telecommunications regulation, emphasising the need for supranational coordination through regulatory networks (Longo et al, 2014;Mathieu, 2016) Empirical research on MLG in the context of state aid for broadband, however, remains limited. Many scholars on both sides of the Atlantic have explored the roles of municipalities in broadband diffusion (Gerli, Van der Wee, Verbrugge, & Whalley, 2018a;Tapia et al, 2009), but little has been said on their interaction with other public actors. Limited to Canada, Rajabiun & Middleton (2013) concluded that decentralised interventions would favour the deployment of broadband networks.…”

“…The existence of market failures has motivated public intervention in EU broadband markets since the late 1990s (Gómez-Barroso & Feijóo, 2010). Whereas early initiatives were autonomously led by local authorities (Gerli et al, 2018a) Alongside such consultations, the EU guidelines outline a number of conditions that need to be fulfilled in the implementation of state aid. For example, subsidised networks must be available to competitors through regulated access, whose price and technical conditions being set by NRAs.…”

A Study of Telecommunication Policies and Broadband Penetration for Sweden and South Korea

“…The main objective of this network is to create a link to each municipality urban canter that has small towns and villages. Through this effort, networks can then be bought, built, or rented out, thereby attracting small network operators (Gerli et al, 2017).…”