The Iterative Convergent Design for Mobile Health Usability Testing: Mixed Methods Approach

Alwashmi, Meshari F; Hawboldt, John; Davis, Erin; Fetters, Michael D.

doi:10.2196/11656

Cited by 77 publications

(64 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Focus groups could yield rich information, as participants would be given the opportunity to compare their thoughts and confirm or expand upon each other’s ideas. After developing a user-centered mHealth intervention, the authors recommend using a mixed methods framework for usability testing [ 48 ]. Additional trials will be required to provide data regarding the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of mHealth interventions in COPD management.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptions of Patients Regarding Mobile Health Interventions for the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed Methods Study

Alwashmi¹,

FitzPatrick²,

Farrell³

et al. 2020

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Using a mobile health (mHealth) intervention consisting of a smartphone and compatible medical device has the potential to enhance chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment outcomes while mitigating health care costs. Objective This study aims to describe the demographics, use, and access to smartphones of patients with COPD. It also aims to explore and develop an understanding of potential facilitators and barriers that might influence patients using mHealth interventions for COPD management. Methods This was an explanatory, sequential mixed methods study. Patients who attended respirology clinics completed a questionnaire on technology access and use. We conducted semistructured individual interviews with the patients. Interview topics included the following: demographics, mHealth use, perceptions toward challenges of mHealth adoption, factors facilitating mHealth adoption, and preferences regarding features of mHealth interventions for COPD management. Results A total of 100 adults completed the survey but 22 participants were excluded because they were not diagnosed with COPD. Of these, 10 patients with COPD participated in the interview. The quantitative component revealed that many patients with COPD owned a mobile phone, but only about one-fourth of the participants (18/77, 23%) owned a smartphone. The likelihood of owning a smartphone was not associated with age, sex, marital status, or geographical location, but patients with high educational status were more likely to own a smartphone. The qualitative component found that patients with COPD, in general, had a positive attitude toward mHealth adoption for COPD management, but several facilitators and barriers were identified. The main facilitators of mHealth adoption are possible health benefits for patients, ease of use, educating patients, and credibility. Alternatively, the barriers to adoption are technical issues, lack of awareness, potential limited uptake from older adults, privacy and confidentiality issues, finances, and lack of interest in mHealth Conclusions It is important to understand the perceptions of patients with COPD regarding the adoption of innovative mHealth interventions for COPD management. This study identifies some potential facilitators and barriers that may inform the successful development and implementation of mHealth interventions for COPD management.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptions of Patients Regarding Mobile Health Interventions for the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed Methods Study

Alwashmi¹,

FitzPatrick²,

Farrell³

et al. 2020

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similar studies carried out within other medical fields have also detected and addressed several issues regarding the feasibility and usability of mHealth interventions. Among these, several also used an iterative approach, which is an established usability strategy . Altogether, this highlights the necessity of development and usability studies when creating mHealth interventions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biofeedback Treatment App for Pediatric Migraine: Development and Usability Study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective.-The objective of this study was to develop and investigate the usability of a biofeedback treatment smartphone app for adolescent migraine sufferers.Background.-Biofeedback is effective in treating pediatric migraine. However, biofeedback is not widely used due to the necessity of a trained therapist and specialized equipment. Emerging digital technology, including smartphones and wearables, enables new ways of administering biofeedback.Methods.-In a prospective open-label development and usability study, 10 adolescent migraine sufferers used a newly developed biofeedback app with wearable sensors that measured their muscle tension, finger temperature, and heart rate. Three iterative rounds of usability testing, including a 2-week home testing period, were completed. A biofeedback algorithm, combining and optimizing the 3 physiological modalities, and several algorithms for sham-treatment were created. Usability was evaluated statistically and summarized thematically.Results.-Five of ten participants completed all 3 rounds of usability testing. A total of 72 biofeedback sessions were completed. Usability scoring was consistently high, with median scores ranging from 3.5 to 4.5 on a 5-point scale. The biofeedback optimization algorithm correlated excellently to the raw physiological measurements (r = 0.85, P < .001). The intervention was safe and tolerable.Conclusion.-We developed an app for young migraine sufferers to receive therapist-independent biofeedback. The app underwent a rigorous development process as well as usability and feasibility testing. It is now ready for clinical trials.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

show abstract

“…After developing a prototype of these human-centred components, the authors recommend using a mixed methods framework for usability testing. 76 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Features of a mobile health intervention to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study

Alwashmi

FitzPatrick

Davis

et al. 2020

Ther Adv Respir Dis

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The use of mobile health (mHealth) interventions has the potential to enhance chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment outcomes. Further research is needed to determine which mHealth features are required to potentially enhance COPD self-management. Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the potential features of an mHealth intervention for COPD management with healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients with COPD. It could inform the development and successful implementation of mHealth interventions for COPD management. Methods: This was a qualitative study. We conducted semi-structured individual interviews with HCPs, including nurses, pharmacists and physicians who work directly with patients with COPD. Interviews were also conducted with a diverse sample of patients with COPD. Interview topics included demographics, mHealth usage, the potential use of medical devices and recommendations for features that would enhance an mHealth intervention for COPD management. Results: A total of 40 people, including nurses, physicians and pharmacists, participated. The main recommendations for the proposed mHealth intervention were categorised into two categories: patient interface and HCP interface. The prevalent features suggested for the patient interface include educating patients, collecting baseline data, collecting subjective data, collecting objective data via compatible medical devices, providing a digital action plan, allowing patients to track their progress, enabling family members to access the mHealth intervention, tailoring the features based on the patient’s unique needs, reminding patients about critical management tasks and rewarding patients for their positive behaviours. The most common features of the HCP interface include allowing HCPs to track their patients’ progress, allowing HCPs to communicate with their patients, educating HCPs and rewarding HCPs. Conclusion: This study identifies important potential features so that the most effective, efficient and feasible mHealth intervention can be developed to improve the management of COPD. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

show abstract

The Iterative Convergent Design for Mobile Health Usability Testing: Mixed Methods Approach

Cited by 77 publications

References 61 publications

Perceptions of Patients Regarding Mobile Health Interventions for the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed Methods Study

Perceptions of Patients Regarding Mobile Health Interventions for the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed Methods Study

Biofeedback Treatment App for Pediatric Migraine: Development and Usability Study

Features of a mobile health intervention to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About