2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02185.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The JCMS Annual Review Lecture. The Shattering of Illusions – And What Next?*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The institutional architecture of the euro area had been conceptualized in a number of earlier reports that were issued in response to the sovereign debt crisis and the difficulties that various EU member states faced following the onset of the financial crisis (Ioannou et al ., ). Whether articulated by scholars (De Grauwe, ; Featherstone, ; Tsoukalis, ) or in EU reports on the matter (Juncker et al ., ; Van Rompuy, ), EMU was incomplete. The EU needed to develop paths for deepening EMU.…”
Section: White Paper On the Future Of Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The institutional architecture of the euro area had been conceptualized in a number of earlier reports that were issued in response to the sovereign debt crisis and the difficulties that various EU member states faced following the onset of the financial crisis (Ioannou et al ., ). Whether articulated by scholars (De Grauwe, ; Featherstone, ; Tsoukalis, ) or in EU reports on the matter (Juncker et al ., ; Van Rompuy, ), EMU was incomplete. The EU needed to develop paths for deepening EMU.…”
Section: White Paper On the Future Of Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 This renewed EU scepticism is mirrored in academic writing, where an EU sceptic position seems on the rise generally. (Tsoukalis, 2011;Usherwood and Startin, 2013) a…”
Section: Can the Eu's Socio-economic Model Survive?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that the Commission and Council should offer a view on Member States' draft budgets before national parliaments have had a chance to do so has understandably reignited concerns about a democratic deficit at the heart of economic and monetary union (EMU) 6 . Such criticisms assume that recommendations issued under the European Semester will be ‘more or less binding’ (Tsoukalis, 2011, p. 29), but this surely exaggerates the significance of the new arrangements, with Member States subject to the same non‐binding recommendations from the Commission and the Council as before. A key question for the evolution of the European Semester is how willing the EU executive and EU finance ministers will be to apply peer pressure through this process and how Member States might respond to such naming and shaming.…”
Section: The Stability and Growth Pact In 2011mentioning
confidence: 99%