The Joint Experiment of Research Supervision

Walker, Beverly M.

doi:10.1002/9780470743577.ch25

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When approaching the topic via the collective search engine EBSCO leading onto PsychINFO, PsycARTICLES/Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, the term “Research Supervision” received 28 responses about research supervision, with the rest referring to articles about clinical supervision. Out of the 28 research supervision‐related responses, only four texts related to psychotherapy (Jervis, ; Walker, ). Out of these four responses, only Jervis () represented a peer‐reviewed journal article.…”

Section: Literature Review About Research Supervisionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“She was on my side, and grounded me when I needed it:” Research supervision in the field of therapy, based on counsellors’ and psychotherapists’ views on their engagement with research

Charleson

2019

Couns and Psychother Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research-supported practice is increasingly emphasised within counselling and psychotherapy at all stages of training. Guided by an interest in how to support therapists in their efforts to develop research knowledge during doctoral training, this paper focuses on research supervision. Research supervision is a surprisingly under-researched area. Little is known to date about how supervisors "go about their supervision" (Bruce & Stoodley, 2013, p. 5), despite the fact that "high failure rates for research dissertations in the social sciences have been partly attributed to student dissatisfaction with supervision and poor student-supervisor relationships" (Armstrong, 2004, p. 134). Between 2016 and 2019, we explored accredited counsellors' and 'psychotherapists engagement with research during or after their doctoral training. This paper explores research supervision with these two previous studies serving as the backdrop (Bager-Charleson et al., 2018a; Bager-Charleson et al., 2018b), together with a literature review into research supervision within social sciences and psychotherapy. Supervision is discussed as a crucial coping/support strategy to (a) link research with practice in therapy work, practically and epistemologically; (b) contain and make sense of the use of transformative learning; (c) balance "enculturation" with critical thinking and emancipation; and (d) support reflective and reflexive development. This paper discusses an adaptive research supervision model, akin to a "holding bond" (Stevens, 2016) which supports the student to reflexively position her/himself personally, intersubjectively, theoretically and socio-culturally, whilst "negotiating the tension" (Lee, 2008) during a process of enculturation into the discipline, and also fostering critical thinking and emancipation to contribute to new knowledge. K E Y W O R D S counselling research, epistemology, practice-based research, psychotherapy research, research supervision [Correction added on 9 Sep 2019, after first online publication on 26 Aug 2019: The author's last name was previously wrong and has been corrected in this current version. Instances of "EBSCP" on page 2 are corrected to "EBSCO" in this current version.]

show abstract

Section: Literature Review About Research Supervisionmentioning

confidence: 99%