“…These approaches involved deep plane, extended supraplatysmal, transblephroplasty, composite, and endoscopic techniques of facelifting. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Moreover, neither of these more invasive approaches have proved to be more successful in producing longer lasting results compared to ''conservative face-lifting'' approach as described by Webster et al [10][11][12][13] Recently, Saylan's S-lift approach gained popularity because of its limited undermining with short recovery and effective rejuvenation mainly limited to the jowl and submental areas, with some midfacial rejuvenation. [14][15][16] In contrast, the approach described here is primarily focused on the midface, and in selected patients, the midface vector correction can be beneficial without neck dissection.…”