2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2006.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The levels of PCV2 specific antibodies and viremia in pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and 3). Similar dynamics of viraemia and antibody response in non-vaccinated piglets after natural PCV-2 infection were observed previously by Carasova et al (19). As in our study, the animals remained viraemic up to the end of the investigation period, even in the presence of post-infectious antibodies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1 and 3). Similar dynamics of viraemia and antibody response in non-vaccinated piglets after natural PCV-2 infection were observed previously by Carasova et al (19). As in our study, the animals remained viraemic up to the end of the investigation period, even in the presence of post-infectious antibodies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This observation is similar to a previous report that seroconversion on PMWS-affected farms appeared earlier than on non-PMWS-affected farms (4). The double-antigen sandwich ELISA indicates similar serological profiles for the 4 farms, which were consistent with the profiles obtained by the reference commercial indirect ELISA and also in agreement with results of previous reports (5,14,25).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The observed serological responses to PCV2 are well in line with previous studies [12,17,19-21] supporting the relationship between PCV2 and PMWS also in finishing pigs. The lack of a proper antibody response in the two pigs that developed PMWS in herd A, further support earlier studies pointing out that neutralizing antibodies to PCV2 are protective against PMWS [22-25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%