The limits of process: On (re)reading Henri Bergson

Abstract

This article offers a reading of the work of Henri Bergson as it pertains to organizations through the lens of ideas drawn from critical realism. It suggests an alternative to interpretations based on a stark division between process and realist perspectives. Much of the existing literature presents a rather partial view of Bergson's work. A review suggests some interesting parallels with themes in critical realism, notably the emergence of mind. Critical realism has a focus on process at its heart, but is also concerned with how the products of such processes become stabilized and form the conditions for action. This suggests that attention might usefully be paid to the relationship between organizational action and the sedimented practices grouped under the heading of 'routines'. More attention to Bergson's account of the relationship between instinct, intuition and intelligence provides a link to the social character of thought, something which can be mapped on to Archer's work on reflexivity and the 'internal conversation'. This suggests that our analyses need to pay attention to both memory and history, to building and dwelling, rather than the one-sided focus found in some process theory accounts.

On the Neglect of Fallibility in Management Learning and Education: From Perfect to Adequate Managers

“…As Helin et al (2014:15) highlight, process philosophy is not a specific theory "but rather a way of thinking… [that] might make us see things anew". In the discussions that follow, I purposefully focus on the work of organizational scholar Robert Chia since this has been notable for making process philosophy accessible to our field (Mutch, 2016). Moreover, as we will shortly see, it is also Chia's work that has alerted us to understanding managerial work as coping-which has particular relevance for our arguments here.…”

A Modus Vivendi between Movement and Materiality: Henri Bergson and the Matter of Organization

“…T he philosophy of Henri Bergson has inspired several scholars in organization studies for a while (Calori, 2002;Khandker, 2017;Linstead, 2002Linstead, , 2014Mutch, 2016) as it brings an interesting approach for considering organization as a making process of actors, roles, technologies (etc.) and their relations.…”