1972
DOI: 10.1086/151441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The - Line Velocity Field in M82

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We agree with the other investigators that the visible outflow at the SE side has to a large extent the geometry of a cone; however, contrary to SBH-98 and in agreement with our earlier observation (M-95) we find that the outflow at the NW side is also Lynds & Sandage (1963) "closed loops" (Ω = 120) (2) Burbidge et al (1964) Ω ≈ 20 pointed (3) Deharveng & Pellet (1970) "loop" 30; 300 (4) Heckathorn (1972) cone pointed (5) Axon & Taylor (1978) cone (6) Bland & Tully (1988) "bubbles" pointed (7) Heckman et al (1990) Ω SE = Ω NW = 62 pointed (8) Götz et al (1990 cone-like. The parameters of the adopted best-fit cone model as derived from the presented observation are summarized in Table 2; the correspondingly calculated velocity branches I-IV for the slit along the minor axis, or parallel to the minor axis (θ = ±20 ), are shown in Fig.…”
Section: The Adopted Model Of the Outflowsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We agree with the other investigators that the visible outflow at the SE side has to a large extent the geometry of a cone; however, contrary to SBH-98 and in agreement with our earlier observation (M-95) we find that the outflow at the NW side is also Lynds & Sandage (1963) "closed loops" (Ω = 120) (2) Burbidge et al (1964) Ω ≈ 20 pointed (3) Deharveng & Pellet (1970) "loop" 30; 300 (4) Heckathorn (1972) cone pointed (5) Axon & Taylor (1978) cone (6) Bland & Tully (1988) "bubbles" pointed (7) Heckman et al (1990) Ω SE = Ω NW = 62 pointed (8) Götz et al (1990 cone-like. The parameters of the adopted best-fit cone model as derived from the presented observation are summarized in Table 2; the correspondingly calculated velocity branches I-IV for the slit along the minor axis, or parallel to the minor axis (θ = ±20 ), are shown in Fig.…”
Section: The Adopted Model Of the Outflowsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Detection at visible wavelengths of rotation of cone wall material at large distances from the disk was mentioned by Bland & Tully and Shopbell & Bland-Hawthorn. Spectra taken by Heckathorn (1972) parallel to the major axis to a distance of 675 pc below and 410 pc above the galactic plane have sloped tracks in the positionvelocity diagrams and by this clearly illustrate rotation of the visible outflow material, in the same direction as the material of the disk and with decreasing velocity for increasing distances from the disk. These and other imaging and spectroscopic observations were used to determine the geometry and kinematics of the visible outflow material; for a recent analysis and summary see SBH-98 and Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Burbidge et al 1964;Heckathorn 1972;O'Connell & Mangano 1978;Götz et al 1990;McK93, Westmoquette et al 2009), a major axis p-v diagram is obtained as shown in the Figs. 1c, 2, and 3.…”
Section: The Stellar Disk-spiral Arm Model and Inconsistenciesmentioning
confidence: 89%