1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-1951(97)00064-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The main tectonic events, depositional history, and the palaeogeography of the southern Urals during the Riphean-early Palaeozoic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rb-Sr and K-Ar dates on the intrusions suggest a pre-1.1 Ga age of the lower part of succession (Puchkov, 2010) and acritarchs from the mid to upper parts of the succession extend the age of sedimentation to the midNeoproterozoic (late Riphean, Siedlecka et al, 2004, and references therein). This succession is interpreted to record an initial history of Mesoproterozoic intracratonic extension and riftrelated sedimentation and magmatism (Mezen' Rift and lower Timanide succession) followed by, in the latest Mesoproterozoic to early Neoproterozoic, development of a passive-margin succession containing cratonic-derived siliciclastic sedimentary rocks (Maslov, 2004;Maslov et al, 1997;Maslov and Isherskaya, 2002;Nikishin et al, 1996;Siedlecka et al, 2004). The rifting could be related to the 1385-1380 Ma Mashak igneous event in southern Urals (Puchkov et al, 2013).…”
Section: Northeast Baltica -Timanides and Pre-uralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rb-Sr and K-Ar dates on the intrusions suggest a pre-1.1 Ga age of the lower part of succession (Puchkov, 2010) and acritarchs from the mid to upper parts of the succession extend the age of sedimentation to the midNeoproterozoic (late Riphean, Siedlecka et al, 2004, and references therein). This succession is interpreted to record an initial history of Mesoproterozoic intracratonic extension and riftrelated sedimentation and magmatism (Mezen' Rift and lower Timanide succession) followed by, in the latest Mesoproterozoic to early Neoproterozoic, development of a passive-margin succession containing cratonic-derived siliciclastic sedimentary rocks (Maslov, 2004;Maslov et al, 1997;Maslov and Isherskaya, 2002;Nikishin et al, 1996;Siedlecka et al, 2004). The rifting could be related to the 1385-1380 Ma Mashak igneous event in southern Urals (Puchkov et al, 2013).…”
Section: Northeast Baltica -Timanides and Pre-uralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These groups represent the transgressive cycles of sedimentation, separated from each other by stratigraphic gaps. The basal parts of the cycles are coarse-grained; volcanics are present at the base of the Burzyanian and Yurmatian (see below); the upper parts of the cycles are composed of clay-carbonate rocks [Stratotype of the Riphean…, 1983;Parnachev, 1981;Maslov et al, 1997;Maslov, 2004;Puchkov, 2010].…”
Section: рис 2 схематическая геологическая карта башкирского мегантmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Paleoproterozoic crystalline basement of the East European Craton (EEC) (see reviews by Maslov et al, 1997;Scarrow et al, 2002;Maslov, 2004;Bogdanova et al, this volume and references therein) is overlain unconformably by a thick (12-15 km in places), predominantly Mesoproterozoic through Neoproterozoic (Upper Riphean and Vendian) sedimentary succession, best exposed in the region of the Bashkirian anticlinorium (Fig. 4).…”
Section: The Eastern Region Of Baltica: Pre-timanianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively little sedimentation occurred during this early Paleozoic rifting episode. Late Ordovician-Silurian to Devonian passive margin sediments (mainly siliciclastics and limestones) were deposited unconformably above the Mesoproterozoic through Neoproterozoic succession prior to the onset of later Devonian-Carboniferous Uralian convergence (see reviews by Savelieva and Nesbitt, 1996;Maslov et al, 1997;Puchkov, 1997a,b;Maslov, 2004).…”
Section: The Eastern Region Of Baltica: Pre-timanianmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation