2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The McKenzie Classification System in the Extremities: A Reliability Study Using Mckenzie Assessment Forms and Experienced Clinicians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9 However, the majority of practitioners using MDT clinical practice do not hold the Dip.MDT. Therefore the attitude towards MDT for extremity problems and inter-examiner classification reliability in the previous study 8 may not be generalized to the majority of practitioners with Cred.MDT clinical practice. Thus, it was warranted to investigate the attitude towards MDT for extremity problems and inter-examiner classification reliability using the same patient vignettes in Cred.MDT practitioners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…9 However, the majority of practitioners using MDT clinical practice do not hold the Dip.MDT. Therefore the attitude towards MDT for extremity problems and inter-examiner classification reliability in the previous study 8 may not be generalized to the majority of practitioners with Cred.MDT clinical practice. Thus, it was warranted to investigate the attitude towards MDT for extremity problems and inter-examiner classification reliability using the same patient vignettes in Cred.MDT practitioners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This study used the same vignettes used in the previous study with no translation from English to Japanese although vignette's number was relabeled to avoid participants knowing the correct classification from the previous study. 8 Each vignette had information regarding: 1) demographics, 2) pain location, 3) current and previous history, and 4) physical examination findings including active and passive movement testing, resisted testing and repeated movement responses. Participants were asked to choose the most appropriate MDT subgroup for each vignette from the following six subgroups: Derangement, Articular Dysfunction, Contractile Dysfunction, Posture, Spinal, or Other.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations