2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1679-78252011000100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanical response of metallic sandwich beams under foam projectile impact loading

Abstract: The dynamic response of the clamped sandwich beams was investigated by impacting the beams at mid-span with metal foam projectiles. Effects of applied impulse, face-sheet thickness and core thickness on the impact resistance of sandwich beams are discussed. Using strain gauge measurement technique, the deformation mechanism of sandwich beams was analyzed in the paper. The results indicate that the structural response is sensitive to the configuration of sandwich structures. Based on the experiments, correspond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Automatic, surface-to-surface contact options were generally used. It should be pointed out that the analyses of the effect of element size on the structural response of sandwich shells were omitted in this study since the similar/same methods was employed in some previous studies and a good agreement was obtained comparing with that of experimental results [7,17,18]. The standard quasi-static tests were conducted for LY-12 aluminum alloy face-sheet and aluminum foam core material in the corresponding experimental investigations [19,20] to obtain the cor-responding mechanical parameters.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Automatic, surface-to-surface contact options were generally used. It should be pointed out that the analyses of the effect of element size on the structural response of sandwich shells were omitted in this study since the similar/same methods was employed in some previous studies and a good agreement was obtained comparing with that of experimental results [7,17,18]. The standard quasi-static tests were conducted for LY-12 aluminum alloy face-sheet and aluminum foam core material in the corresponding experimental investigations [19,20] to obtain the cor-responding mechanical parameters.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary studies [5,7,9,11] show that the center-point deflection of sandwich structures is reduced by increasing the face-sheet thickness, core thickness and relative density and this however leads to an increase in the structural weight. How to make a compromise between strength and weight is one of the most important issues that need to be considered in the design of sandwich structures.…”
Section: Near-optimal Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the research carried out by Edison et al, 16 the surface using PEG-400 offers a very promising method for depositing micro-and nano-fillers on Kevlar surface to enhance ballistic impact performance of the hybrid laminate. The high-velocity impact response of a range of novel aluminum foam sandwich structures has been investigated using a nitrogen gas gun by Villanueva and Cantwell, 17 Jing et al, 18 Lopatnikov et al 19 Radford et al 20 investigated the dynamic response of the clamped sandwich beams and planes by impacting the beams at mid-span with metal foam projectiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It makes the study of the projectile impact resistance of sandwich components a significant task. Much theoretical, numerical and experimental work in dynamic properties including projectile impact resistance of sandwich structures with cellular cores has been taken (Zhu, et al, 2008;Jing, et al, 2011;Yin, et al, 2013;Ni, et al, 2013;Zhang, et al, 2013;Su, et al, 2013;Fan, et al, 2014;Jiang, et al, 2014;Ebrahimi et al, 2016). Liaghat et al (2010) introduced an analytical model based on energy method to predict the ballistic limit of metallic honeycombs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%