2016
DOI: 10.1080/10402381.2016.1170079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The modeled and observed response of Lake Spokane hypolimnetic dissolved oxygen concentrations to phosphorus inputs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our climate and flow sensitivity analyses showed that the model was rather insensitive to cold and warm conditions and a very wide range in flows. The model underestimated the observed DO values in Lake Spokane by ~1.2 to 2.3 mg/L (average ~26%) for the wide range of flows tested, which is similar to the modeled results previously reported for a wide range of TP IN concentrations in the Lake Spokane (~30% underestimation; Brett et al, ). When comparing the relationship between DO MIN and each variable (TP, Chl a , and temperature) with flow (Figures b, , b, and d), the modeled Chl a and temperature responses had the poorest correspondence with the observed data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, our climate and flow sensitivity analyses showed that the model was rather insensitive to cold and warm conditions and a very wide range in flows. The model underestimated the observed DO values in Lake Spokane by ~1.2 to 2.3 mg/L (average ~26%) for the wide range of flows tested, which is similar to the modeled results previously reported for a wide range of TP IN concentrations in the Lake Spokane (~30% underestimation; Brett et al, ). When comparing the relationship between DO MIN and each variable (TP, Chl a , and temperature) with flow (Figures b, , b, and d), the modeled Chl a and temperature responses had the poorest correspondence with the observed data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…When comparing the relationship between DO MIN and each variable (TP, Chl a , and temperature) with flow (Figures b, , b, and d), the modeled Chl a and temperature responses had the poorest correspondence with the observed data. A possible reason for this underestimation is that the model's DO outcomes are poorly related to the TP‐Chl a ‐DO kinetic process representation in the model (Brett et al, ). For example, the overestimated TP R and Chl a concentrations could account for more DO depletion by organic matter decay and algal respiration in the flow sensitivity scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations